Evaluation of a vessel sealing system, bipolar electrosurgery, harmonic scalpel, titanium clips, endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis vascular staples and sutures for arterial and venous ligation in a porcine model.

IF 6.8 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Jaime Landman, Kurt Kerbl, Jamil Rehman, Cassio Andreoni, Peter A Humphrey, William Collyer, Ephrem Olweny, Chandru Sundaram, Ralph V Clayman
{"title":"Evaluation of a vessel sealing system, bipolar electrosurgery, harmonic scalpel, titanium clips, endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis vascular staples and sutures for arterial and venous ligation in a porcine model.","authors":"Jaime Landman,&nbsp;Kurt Kerbl,&nbsp;Jamil Rehman,&nbsp;Cassio Andreoni,&nbsp;Peter A Humphrey,&nbsp;William Collyer,&nbsp;Ephrem Olweny,&nbsp;Chandru Sundaram,&nbsp;Ralph V Clayman","doi":"10.1097/01.ju.0000045160.87700.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We assessed the usefulness of the LigaSure (Valleylab, Boulder, Colorado) vessel sealing system for vascular control during laparoscopic surgery and compared it with other available hemostatic modalities.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 31 domestic pigs were divided into 5 groups. In groups 1 and 2 the vessel sealing system was compared with titanium clips and Endo-GIA (United States Surgical, Stamford, Connecticut) staples. In group 3 the vessel sealing system was compared with standard Klepinger (Karl Storz, Culver City, California) bipolar forceps. In group 4 the harmonic scalpel and Trimax (United States Surgical) bipolar forceps were compared. In group 5 in vivo laparoscopic application of the vessel sealing system was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 5 mm. laparoscopic vessel sealing system sealed arteries up to 6 mm. and veins up to 12 mm. in diameter at supraphysiological bursting pressure. We evaluated 13 arteries with a diameter of 6 mm. or less at a mean bursting pressure of 662 mm. Hg (range 363 to 1,985) and 11 veins with a diameter of 12 mm. or less with a mean bursting pressure of 233 mm. Hg (range 63 to 440). Collateral tissue damage extended 1 to 3 mm. from the application site. Standard bipolar energy with Klepinger and Trimax forceps was less reliable and in some cases vessel sealing could not be accurately assessed before vessel division. Collateral tissue injury was 1 to 6 mm. The harmonic scalpel did not reliably seal vessels larger than 3 mm. but resulted in the least acute collateral tissue injury of 0 to 1 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the porcine model the LigaSure system is a viable option for laparoscopic management of arteries up to 6 mm. and veins up to 12 mm. in diameter.</p>","PeriodicalId":17471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urology","volume":"169 2","pages":"697-700"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2003-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000045160.87700.32","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We assessed the usefulness of the LigaSure (Valleylab, Boulder, Colorado) vessel sealing system for vascular control during laparoscopic surgery and compared it with other available hemostatic modalities.

Materials and methods: A total of 31 domestic pigs were divided into 5 groups. In groups 1 and 2 the vessel sealing system was compared with titanium clips and Endo-GIA (United States Surgical, Stamford, Connecticut) staples. In group 3 the vessel sealing system was compared with standard Klepinger (Karl Storz, Culver City, California) bipolar forceps. In group 4 the harmonic scalpel and Trimax (United States Surgical) bipolar forceps were compared. In group 5 in vivo laparoscopic application of the vessel sealing system was evaluated.

Results: The 5 mm. laparoscopic vessel sealing system sealed arteries up to 6 mm. and veins up to 12 mm. in diameter at supraphysiological bursting pressure. We evaluated 13 arteries with a diameter of 6 mm. or less at a mean bursting pressure of 662 mm. Hg (range 363 to 1,985) and 11 veins with a diameter of 12 mm. or less with a mean bursting pressure of 233 mm. Hg (range 63 to 440). Collateral tissue damage extended 1 to 3 mm. from the application site. Standard bipolar energy with Klepinger and Trimax forceps was less reliable and in some cases vessel sealing could not be accurately assessed before vessel division. Collateral tissue injury was 1 to 6 mm. The harmonic scalpel did not reliably seal vessels larger than 3 mm. but resulted in the least acute collateral tissue injury of 0 to 1 mm.

Conclusions: In the porcine model the LigaSure system is a viable option for laparoscopic management of arteries up to 6 mm. and veins up to 12 mm. in diameter.

猪模型中血管封闭系统、双极电外科、谐波手术刀、钛夹、内镜胃肠道吻合血管钉和缝合用于动脉和静脉结扎的评估。
目的:我们评估了LigaSure (Valleylab, Boulder, Colorado)血管密封系统在腹腔镜手术中血管控制的有效性,并将其与其他可用的止血方式进行了比较。材料与方法:将31头家猪分为5组。在1组和2组中,血管密封系统与钛夹和Endo-GIA (United States Surgical, Stamford, Connecticut)订书钉进行比较。在第三组中,将血管密封系统与标准Klepinger (Karl Storz, Culver City, California)双极钳进行比较。在第4组比较谐波手术刀和Trimax(美国外科)双极钳。在第5组,评估血管密封系统在体内腹腔镜下的应用。结果:在超生理破裂压力下,5mm腹腔镜血管密封系统可密封直径达6mm的动脉和直径达12mm的静脉。我们评估了13条动脉直径为6mm或更小,平均破裂压力为662 mm。汞柱(范围363至1985)和11个直径为12毫米或更小的静脉,平均破裂压力为233毫米。汞柱(范围63 - 440)。侧枝组织损伤从应用部位延伸1至3毫米。Klepinger钳和Trimax钳的标准双极能量不太可靠,在某些情况下,在血管分割前不能准确评估血管密封。侧枝组织损伤1 ~ 6mm。结论:在猪模型中,LigaSure系统是一种可行的腹腔镜治疗方案,可用于直径达6毫米的动脉和直径达12毫米的静脉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Urology
Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
7.60%
发文量
3746
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Official Journal of the American Urological Association (AUA), and the most widely read and highly cited journal in the field, The Journal of Urology® brings solid coverage of the clinically relevant content needed to stay at the forefront of the dynamic field of urology. This premier journal presents investigative studies on critical areas of research and practice, survey articles providing short condensations of the best and most important urology literature worldwide, and practice-oriented reports on significant clinical observations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信