Methadone treatment in Ontario after the 1996 regulation reforms. Results of a physician survey.

Annales de medecine interne Pub Date : 2002-11-01
Benedikt Fischer, Deanna Cape, Natalie Daniel, Louis Gliksman
{"title":"Methadone treatment in Ontario after the 1996 regulation reforms. Results of a physician survey.","authors":"Benedikt Fischer,&nbsp;Deanna Cape,&nbsp;Natalie Daniel,&nbsp;Louis Gliksman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over two decades of rather restrictive regulations have kept the availability of methadone treatment (MT) at low levels in the province of Ontario, Canada. Regulatory changes in the Province of Ontario in the mid-1990s relaxed relevant authorization and treatment practice guidelines. Subsequently, the number of physicians authorized for methadone treatment and treatment spots increased substantially. A large number of the newly authorized physicians are general/local medical practitioners. This study reports on the results of a survey conducted with the majority of MT prescribing physicians in Ontario authorized at the time of study. Physicians were surveyed on their attitudes and practices with regards to the MT authorization system, treatment approaches, requirements and workload, patient 'stability', additional opiate substitution treatment needs, and with regards to general issues and concerns about the new MT governance system. The article also discusses patterns and differences that were found between physicians when comparing their geographic location, whether they see themselves practicing under a 'harm reduction' or an 'abstinence' approach, and whether they received MT authorization under the old or the new guidelines. It is concluded that the liberalized regulations and the increased incorporation of local physicians seems to provide for an overall more desirable system of governance of MT. However, some relevant concerns about the current system exist and are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":75505,"journal":{"name":"Annales de medecine interne","volume":"153 7 Suppl","pages":"2S11-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales de medecine interne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over two decades of rather restrictive regulations have kept the availability of methadone treatment (MT) at low levels in the province of Ontario, Canada. Regulatory changes in the Province of Ontario in the mid-1990s relaxed relevant authorization and treatment practice guidelines. Subsequently, the number of physicians authorized for methadone treatment and treatment spots increased substantially. A large number of the newly authorized physicians are general/local medical practitioners. This study reports on the results of a survey conducted with the majority of MT prescribing physicians in Ontario authorized at the time of study. Physicians were surveyed on their attitudes and practices with regards to the MT authorization system, treatment approaches, requirements and workload, patient 'stability', additional opiate substitution treatment needs, and with regards to general issues and concerns about the new MT governance system. The article also discusses patterns and differences that were found between physicians when comparing their geographic location, whether they see themselves practicing under a 'harm reduction' or an 'abstinence' approach, and whether they received MT authorization under the old or the new guidelines. It is concluded that the liberalized regulations and the increased incorporation of local physicians seems to provide for an overall more desirable system of governance of MT. However, some relevant concerns about the current system exist and are discussed.

1996年安大略省美沙酮治疗法规改革后。医生调查的结果。
在加拿大安大略省,二十多年来相当严格的法规使美沙酮治疗(MT)的可用性保持在低水平。20世纪90年代中期,安大略省的监管变化放宽了相关的授权和治疗实践指南。随后,授权美沙酮治疗的医师数量和治疗点大幅增加。许多新获授权的医生是全科医生/当地医生。本研究报告了一项调查的结果,该调查是在安大略省研究时授权的大多数MT处方医生进行的。调查了医生对MT授权系统、治疗方法、要求和工作量、患者“稳定性”、额外的阿片类替代治疗需求以及关于新的MT管理系统的一般问题和关注的态度和做法。这篇文章还讨论了医生在比较他们的地理位置时发现的模式和差异,他们是否认为自己在“减少伤害”或“禁欲”的方法下执业,以及他们是否在旧的或新的指导方针下获得MT授权。结论是,法规的放宽和当地医生的增加似乎提供了一个总体上更理想的MT治理体系。然而,目前系统存在一些相关问题,并进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信