More Pharmacists in High-Risk Neighborhoods of New York City Support Selling Syringes to Injection Drug Users

Phillip O. Coffin MIA (project director), Jennifer Ahern MPH (data analyst), Stacy Dorris (research assistant), Lori Stevenson PhD (investigator), Crystal Fuller PhD (investigator), David Vlahov PhD (director)
{"title":"More Pharmacists in High-Risk Neighborhoods of New York City Support Selling Syringes to Injection Drug Users","authors":"Phillip O. Coffin MIA (project director),&nbsp;Jennifer Ahern MPH (data analyst),&nbsp;Stacy Dorris (research assistant),&nbsp;Lori Stevenson PhD (investigator),&nbsp;Crystal Fuller PhD (investigator),&nbsp;David Vlahov PhD (director)","doi":"10.1331/1086-5802.42.0.S62.Coffin","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To document changes in pharmacists’ opinions and practices from the time of passage to implementation of a law permitting selling syringes without a prescription (the Expanded Syringe Access Demonstration Program [ESAP]).</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Two cross-sectional randomized telephone surveys.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>High-risk neighborhoods of New York City.</p></div><div><h3>Subjects</h3><p>Pharmacists.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measure</h3><p>Support for selling syringes without a prescription to injection drug users (IDUs).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We completed 130 surveys at baseline (BL) in August 2000, from neighborhoods with high numbers of injection-related acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) cases and 231 surveys at law change (LC) in January 2001. To correct for differences in sampling, we limited the analysis to pharmacies in ZIP Codes represented in both samples and weighted results to adjust for the median income level of those postal codes. From BL (n = 83) to LC (n = 84), law awareness increased (43% to 90%, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), as did personal support for selling syringes without a prescription to IDUs (36% to 63%, <em>P</em> &lt; .001). From BL to LC, a larger proportion of supporters believed that selling syringes was an important part of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention and would help decrease HIV transmission, and a smaller proportion was concerned about customer discomfort and increased drug use. A total of 40% of respondents were ESAP registered at LC but registration was not associated with support for selling syringes to IDUs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Support for ESAP among pharmacists increased in high-risk neighborhoods as the program was implemented. The finding that some pharmacists were ESAP registered but did not support selling syringes to IDUs and others were supportive, but not ESAP registered, may have program implications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79444,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association (Washington, D.C. : 1996)","volume":"42 6","pages":"Pages S62-S67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1331/1086-5802.42.0.S62.Coffin","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association (Washington, D.C. : 1996)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1086580215301145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Objective

To document changes in pharmacists’ opinions and practices from the time of passage to implementation of a law permitting selling syringes without a prescription (the Expanded Syringe Access Demonstration Program [ESAP]).

Design

Two cross-sectional randomized telephone surveys.

Setting

High-risk neighborhoods of New York City.

Subjects

Pharmacists.

Main Outcome Measure

Support for selling syringes without a prescription to injection drug users (IDUs).

Results

We completed 130 surveys at baseline (BL) in August 2000, from neighborhoods with high numbers of injection-related acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) cases and 231 surveys at law change (LC) in January 2001. To correct for differences in sampling, we limited the analysis to pharmacies in ZIP Codes represented in both samples and weighted results to adjust for the median income level of those postal codes. From BL (n = 83) to LC (n = 84), law awareness increased (43% to 90%, P < .001), as did personal support for selling syringes without a prescription to IDUs (36% to 63%, P < .001). From BL to LC, a larger proportion of supporters believed that selling syringes was an important part of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention and would help decrease HIV transmission, and a smaller proportion was concerned about customer discomfort and increased drug use. A total of 40% of respondents were ESAP registered at LC but registration was not associated with support for selling syringes to IDUs.

Conclusions

Support for ESAP among pharmacists increased in high-risk neighborhoods as the program was implemented. The finding that some pharmacists were ESAP registered but did not support selling syringes to IDUs and others were supportive, but not ESAP registered, may have program implications.

纽约市高危社区越来越多的药剂师支持向注射吸毒者出售注射器
目的记录从允许无处方销售注射器的法律(扩大注射器准入示范计划[ESAP])通过到实施期间药师的意见和做法的变化。设计两个横断面随机电话调查。设置纽约市高危社区受试者药剂师主要结果测量支持向注射吸毒者(IDUs)销售无处方注射器结果我们于2000年8月在注射相关获得性免疫缺陷综合征(AIDS)高发社区完成了基线调查(BL) 130次,2001年1月在法律变更(LC)时完成了调查(231次)。为了纠正抽样的差异,我们将分析限制在两个样本中所代表的邮政编码的药店,并对结果进行加权以调整这些邮政编码的收入中位数水平。从BL (n = 83)到LC (n = 84),法律意识提高了(43%至90%,P <P < 0.001),个人支持向注射吸毒者出售没有处方的注射器的比例(36%对63%)也是如此。措施)。从BL到LC,更大比例的支持者认为销售注射器是预防人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)的重要组成部分,有助于减少HIV的传播,而较小比例的支持者担心顾客不适和增加吸毒。共有40%的答复者在LC进行了ESAP登记,但登记与支持向注射吸毒者出售注射器无关。结论随着项目的实施,高危社区药师对ESAP的支持有所增加。一些药剂师是ESAP注册的,但不支持向静脉注射者销售注射器,而另一些药剂师是支持的,但没有ESAP注册,这一发现可能对项目有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信