Coronary artery calcification at electron beam computed tomography is increased in asymptomatic type 2 diabetics independent of traditional risk factors.

Megan L Wolfe, Nayyar Iqbal, Warren Gefter, Emile R Mohler, Daniel J Rader, Muredach P Reilly
{"title":"Coronary artery calcification at electron beam computed tomography is increased in asymptomatic type 2 diabetics independent of traditional risk factors.","authors":"Megan L Wolfe,&nbsp;Nayyar Iqbal,&nbsp;Warren Gefter,&nbsp;Emile R Mohler,&nbsp;Daniel J Rader,&nbsp;Muredach P Reilly","doi":"10.1097/01.hjr.0000049242.21319.a7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is two- to fourfold greater in type 2 diabetics than in non-diabetics and cannot be accounted for by traditional risk factors alone. Coronary artery calcification (CAC) at electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) is a non-invasive index of coronary atherosclerosis. We hypothesized that the presence and extent of CAC would be greater in asymptomatic type 2 diabetics than in non-diabetics independent of traditional risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed CAC data of all asymptomatic subjects referred for EBCT between 1996-1999 and compared CAC scores in type 2 diabetics ( n= 71) to all non-diabetics ( n= 1481) and to a randomly selected group of non-diabetics matched for all traditional CVD risk factors ( n= 71).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CAC scores were greater in type 2 diabetics (272 +/- 472, median 41) than in all non-diabetics (104 +/- 288, median 4; < 0.01) and matched non-diabetics (188 +/- 354; < 0.05, median 12; < 0.05). The odds ratio (OR) for the presence of CAC (scores > 0) in type 2 diabetics was 2.9 [95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.1-7.8] after adjustment for traditional CVD risk factors. Type 2 diabetes was also associated (adjusted OR 2.15, 95%CI 1.3-3.6) with the extent of CAC when categorized as an ordinal outcome (CAC scores 0, 1-79, 80-399 and > 400). In type 2 diabetics, age, sex and body mass index were associated with extent of CAC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CAC scores at EBCT are greater in type 2 diabetics than non-diabetic subjects, cannot be accounted for by traditional risk factors alone and may be useful for identifying novel factors for coronary atherosclerosis in type 2 diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":79345,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiovascular risk","volume":"9 6","pages":"369-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiovascular risk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjr.0000049242.21319.a7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is two- to fourfold greater in type 2 diabetics than in non-diabetics and cannot be accounted for by traditional risk factors alone. Coronary artery calcification (CAC) at electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) is a non-invasive index of coronary atherosclerosis. We hypothesized that the presence and extent of CAC would be greater in asymptomatic type 2 diabetics than in non-diabetics independent of traditional risk factors.

Methods: We reviewed CAC data of all asymptomatic subjects referred for EBCT between 1996-1999 and compared CAC scores in type 2 diabetics ( n= 71) to all non-diabetics ( n= 1481) and to a randomly selected group of non-diabetics matched for all traditional CVD risk factors ( n= 71).

Results: CAC scores were greater in type 2 diabetics (272 +/- 472, median 41) than in all non-diabetics (104 +/- 288, median 4; < 0.01) and matched non-diabetics (188 +/- 354; < 0.05, median 12; < 0.05). The odds ratio (OR) for the presence of CAC (scores > 0) in type 2 diabetics was 2.9 [95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.1-7.8] after adjustment for traditional CVD risk factors. Type 2 diabetes was also associated (adjusted OR 2.15, 95%CI 1.3-3.6) with the extent of CAC when categorized as an ordinal outcome (CAC scores 0, 1-79, 80-399 and > 400). In type 2 diabetics, age, sex and body mass index were associated with extent of CAC.

Conclusions: CAC scores at EBCT are greater in type 2 diabetics than non-diabetic subjects, cannot be accounted for by traditional risk factors alone and may be useful for identifying novel factors for coronary atherosclerosis in type 2 diabetes.

电子束计算机断层扫描显示无症状2型糖尿病患者冠状动脉钙化增加,与传统危险因素无关。
背景:2型糖尿病患者发生心血管疾病(CVD)的风险是非糖尿病患者的2 - 4倍,不能仅用传统的危险因素来解释。电子束计算机断层扫描(EBCT)显示冠状动脉钙化(CAC)是冠状动脉粥样硬化的无创指标。我们假设无症状2型糖尿病患者的CAC的存在和程度大于非糖尿病患者,独立于传统的危险因素。方法:我们回顾了1996-1999年间所有接受EBCT的无症状受试者的CAC数据,并将2型糖尿病患者(n= 71)与所有非糖尿病患者(n= 1481)以及随机选择的符合所有传统CVD危险因素的非糖尿病患者(n= 71)的CAC评分进行比较。结果:2型糖尿病患者的CAC评分(272 +/- 472,中位数41)高于所有非糖尿病患者(104 +/- 288,中位数4;< 0.01)和匹配的非糖尿病患者(188 +/- 354;< 0.05,中位数12;< 0.05)。校正传统心血管疾病危险因素后,2型糖尿病患者存在CAC(评分> 0)的比值比(OR)为2.9[95%置信区间(CI) 1.1-7.8]。当2型糖尿病被归类为普通结局(CAC评分0、1-79、80-399和> 400)时,也与CAC程度相关(调整OR 2.15, 95%CI 1.3-3.6)。在2型糖尿病患者中,年龄、性别和体重指数与CAC的程度相关。结论:2型糖尿病患者的EBCT CAC评分高于非糖尿病患者,不能仅用传统的危险因素来解释,可能有助于识别2型糖尿病冠状动脉粥样硬化的新因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信