Assessing risks--challenges posed by the European general product safety directive.

Dirk van Aken
{"title":"Assessing risks--challenges posed by the European general product safety directive.","authors":"Dirk van Aken","doi":"10.1076/icsp.9.3.151.8706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The concept of risk appears in a prominent way in the recently revised European Directive on General Product Safety (GPSD). Risk assessment is therefore an important tool for the success of the Directive; the question is how risk assessment should be carried out in a systematic manner in order to meet the aims of the Directive. In this paper, the references in the GPSD concerning the concept of risk are reviewed and compared with reported problems in European risk assessment. Existing guidelines for risk assessment are examined in order to determine what factors determine the consistency of the outcome. This leads to recommendations for a process that could be followed in order to make risk assessment successful in the context of the GPSD. On the basis of existing guidelines for risk assessment, criteria are formulated with which methods of risk assessment should comply. A stepwise process is proposed in order to develop a common method of risk assessment that can be applied in Europe to support the GPSD. The requirements for risk management in the new GPSD are rather abstract and lack specification, both for producers and for enforcement authorities. The Directive further refers to the need to develop non-binding guidelines in due course. Sources of different outcomes of the risk assessment process are outlined in this paper as well as possibilities to achieve a more consistent basis for decision, more uniformity and transparency. These are essential conditions if one wishes to avoid both undue trade barriers and unsafe products on the market. A leading role for the European Commission seems necessary to make sure that the intentions of the GPSD are accomplished.</p>","PeriodicalId":84914,"journal":{"name":"Injury control and safety promotion","volume":"9 3","pages":"151-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1076/icsp.9.3.151.8706","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury control and safety promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1076/icsp.9.3.151.8706","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The concept of risk appears in a prominent way in the recently revised European Directive on General Product Safety (GPSD). Risk assessment is therefore an important tool for the success of the Directive; the question is how risk assessment should be carried out in a systematic manner in order to meet the aims of the Directive. In this paper, the references in the GPSD concerning the concept of risk are reviewed and compared with reported problems in European risk assessment. Existing guidelines for risk assessment are examined in order to determine what factors determine the consistency of the outcome. This leads to recommendations for a process that could be followed in order to make risk assessment successful in the context of the GPSD. On the basis of existing guidelines for risk assessment, criteria are formulated with which methods of risk assessment should comply. A stepwise process is proposed in order to develop a common method of risk assessment that can be applied in Europe to support the GPSD. The requirements for risk management in the new GPSD are rather abstract and lack specification, both for producers and for enforcement authorities. The Directive further refers to the need to develop non-binding guidelines in due course. Sources of different outcomes of the risk assessment process are outlined in this paper as well as possibilities to achieve a more consistent basis for decision, more uniformity and transparency. These are essential conditions if one wishes to avoid both undue trade barriers and unsafe products on the market. A leading role for the European Commission seems necessary to make sure that the intentions of the GPSD are accomplished.

评估风险——欧洲通用产品安全指令带来的挑战。
在最近修订的欧洲一般产品安全指令(GPSD)中,风险的概念以突出的方式出现。因此,风险评估是该指令成功实施的重要工具;问题是如何以系统的方式进行风险评估,以满足指令的目标。本文回顾了GPSD中有关风险概念的参考文献,并与欧洲风险评估中报告的问题进行了比较。审查现有的风险评估准则,以确定哪些因素决定了结果的一致性。这导致了对一个可以遵循的过程的建议,以便在GPSD的背景下成功进行风险评估。在现有风险评估准则的基础上,制定了风险评估方法应遵守的标准。提出了一个循序渐进的过程,以制定一种可在欧洲应用的风险评估的共同方法,以支持gsd。对于生产者和执法机构来说,新的gsd对风险管理的要求相当抽象,缺乏规范。该指令进一步提到需要在适当时候制定不具约束力的准则。本文概述了风险评估过程中不同结果的来源,以及实现更一致的决策基础、更均匀性和透明度的可能性。如果希望避免不适当的贸易壁垒和市场上不安全的产品,这些都是必不可少的条件。欧盟委员会(European Commission)似乎有必要发挥主导作用,以确保实现《全球通用经济政策》(GPSD)的意图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信