{"title":"Coronary risk versus cardiovascular risk for treatment decisions in mild hypertension.","authors":"Wilfred W Yeo, Karen Rowland Yeo","doi":"10.1177/174182670200900508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>British guidelines recommend treatment for mild hypertension at a cardiovascular (CVD) risk threshold of 20% over 10 years. However, treatment is targeted at the equivalent coronary (CHD) risk of 15% over 10 years. We examined the relationship between CHD and CVD risk in men and women with mild hypertension and assessed the accuracy of using a 10-year CHD risk threshold of 15% to identify patients at a 10-year CVD risk > or = 20%.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional survey of England in 1998.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified 5588 subjects aged 35-74 years free of cardiovascular disease with complete data for risk assessment. Of these, 1364 (24.4%) had mild hypertension (systolic pressure 140-159 mmHg or diastolic pressure 90-99 mmHg). The Framingham functions were used to estimate CHD and CVD event risk for each individual.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a 10-year CHD risk of 15%, the corresponding 10-year CVD risk for men and women, respectively was 20% and 21% in those aged < 55 years, and 24% and 25% in those aged > or = 55 years. Using a 10-year CHD risk threshold of 15% to identify patients at a 10-year CVD risk > or = 20% had high specificity (>96%) in all four groups. For men and women respectively, the sensitivity was 73% (62-84%) and 62% (35-88%) in younger subjects, and 89% (85-93%) and 47% (38-56%) in older subjects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using a 10-year CHD risk of 15% to target patients at a 10-year CVD risk > or = 20% was reasonably accurate for men but missed about 50% of women eligible for antihypertensive treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":79345,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiovascular risk","volume":"9 5","pages":"275-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/174182670200900508","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiovascular risk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/174182670200900508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
Background: British guidelines recommend treatment for mild hypertension at a cardiovascular (CVD) risk threshold of 20% over 10 years. However, treatment is targeted at the equivalent coronary (CHD) risk of 15% over 10 years. We examined the relationship between CHD and CVD risk in men and women with mild hypertension and assessed the accuracy of using a 10-year CHD risk threshold of 15% to identify patients at a 10-year CVD risk > or = 20%.
Design: Cross-sectional survey of England in 1998.
Methods: We identified 5588 subjects aged 35-74 years free of cardiovascular disease with complete data for risk assessment. Of these, 1364 (24.4%) had mild hypertension (systolic pressure 140-159 mmHg or diastolic pressure 90-99 mmHg). The Framingham functions were used to estimate CHD and CVD event risk for each individual.
Results: At a 10-year CHD risk of 15%, the corresponding 10-year CVD risk for men and women, respectively was 20% and 21% in those aged < 55 years, and 24% and 25% in those aged > or = 55 years. Using a 10-year CHD risk threshold of 15% to identify patients at a 10-year CVD risk > or = 20% had high specificity (>96%) in all four groups. For men and women respectively, the sensitivity was 73% (62-84%) and 62% (35-88%) in younger subjects, and 89% (85-93%) and 47% (38-56%) in older subjects.
Conclusion: Using a 10-year CHD risk of 15% to target patients at a 10-year CVD risk > or = 20% was reasonably accurate for men but missed about 50% of women eligible for antihypertensive treatment.