Effect of stimulus contrast uncertainty on simple reaction time.

M Mihaylova, A Vassilev
{"title":"Effect of stimulus contrast uncertainty on simple reaction time.","authors":"M Mihaylova,&nbsp;A Vassilev","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Both reaction time (RT) and the latency of the visually evoked potentials (VEP) to grating onset increase with increasing stimulus spatial frequency (SF). At SF higher than 5 c/deg RT increases faster than VEP latency, the difference resulting in a \"central delay\" (Mihaylova et al., 1999). Due to the equipment limitations, RT and VEP experiments of Mihaylova et al. (1999) differed in constancy of stimulus contrast within a sequence of trials. The present experiments were aimed at testing the assumption that the central delay is a result of contrast uncertainty effect on RT. To this end, RT were measured in condition of both constant and variable grating contrast. The stimuli were sinusoidal gratings ranging in SF from 0.5 to 16 c/deg and in contrast from 2.5 to 50%. In addition, VEP were recorded to the same stimuli in blocks of fixed contrast and the latencies of the early VEP wave were subtracted from RT. Contrast uncertainty did not affect RT at low SF, 0.5 and 2 c/deg, while increasing RT at SF higher than 5 c/deg both at low and high stimulus contrast. The results showed that the central component of RT increase at high SF is reduced but not eliminated under constant contrast condition. The uncertainty effect at high SF might be due to contrast sensitivity reduction, reduced subjective stimulus probability and differences in response strategy adopted by the subjects when contrast was constant or variable. An alternative explanation is a larger ability of low SF stimuli compared to high SF stimuli to attract visual attention.</p>","PeriodicalId":7035,"journal":{"name":"Acta physiologica et pharmacologica Bulgarica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta physiologica et pharmacologica Bulgarica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Both reaction time (RT) and the latency of the visually evoked potentials (VEP) to grating onset increase with increasing stimulus spatial frequency (SF). At SF higher than 5 c/deg RT increases faster than VEP latency, the difference resulting in a "central delay" (Mihaylova et al., 1999). Due to the equipment limitations, RT and VEP experiments of Mihaylova et al. (1999) differed in constancy of stimulus contrast within a sequence of trials. The present experiments were aimed at testing the assumption that the central delay is a result of contrast uncertainty effect on RT. To this end, RT were measured in condition of both constant and variable grating contrast. The stimuli were sinusoidal gratings ranging in SF from 0.5 to 16 c/deg and in contrast from 2.5 to 50%. In addition, VEP were recorded to the same stimuli in blocks of fixed contrast and the latencies of the early VEP wave were subtracted from RT. Contrast uncertainty did not affect RT at low SF, 0.5 and 2 c/deg, while increasing RT at SF higher than 5 c/deg both at low and high stimulus contrast. The results showed that the central component of RT increase at high SF is reduced but not eliminated under constant contrast condition. The uncertainty effect at high SF might be due to contrast sensitivity reduction, reduced subjective stimulus probability and differences in response strategy adopted by the subjects when contrast was constant or variable. An alternative explanation is a larger ability of low SF stimuli compared to high SF stimuli to attract visual attention.

刺激对比不确定度对简单反应时间的影响。
反应时间(RT)和视觉诱发电位潜伏期(VEP)均随刺激空间频率(SF)的增加而增加。当SF高于5℃/℃时,RT比VEP潜伏期增加得更快,这种差异导致“中枢延迟”(Mihaylova et al., 1999)。由于设备的限制,Mihaylova et al.(1999)的RT和VEP实验在一系列试验中刺激对比的恒常性存在差异。本实验旨在验证中心延迟是对比度不确定度对RT的影响的假设。为此,在恒定和可变光栅对比度条件下测量了RT。刺激是正弦光栅,SF范围从0.5到16℃/度,对比范围从2.5到50%。此外,记录相同刺激下固定对比度的VEP,并从RT中减去早期VEP波的潜伏期。在低SF、0.5和2 c/°时,对比不确定性对RT没有影响,而在低和高刺激对比度下,SF大于5 c/°时,RT均增加。结果表明,在恒定对比度条件下,高SF时RT增加的中心分量减小但不消除。高SF下的不确定性效应可能是由于对比敏感性降低、主观刺激概率降低以及对比度恒定和变对比度时被试反应策略的差异所致。另一种解释是低SF刺激比高SF刺激更能吸引视觉注意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信