Nurses perspective of patient acuity on geriatric assessment units.

B Wilden, J McMullen, E Goudy
{"title":"Nurses perspective of patient acuity on geriatric assessment units.","authors":"B Wilden,&nbsp;J McMullen,&nbsp;E Goudy","doi":"10.12927/cjnl.1999.19081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to explore how nurses on geriatric assessment inpatient units perceived patient acuity. Three questions were developed and included: what variables do nurses use to define acuity; does variation exist between and among groups of nurses; and are there nursing activities taken for granted or overlooked that can contribute to the perception of acuity? The purposive sample included all the full time and part time nurses (11 RNs, 16 LPNs) working on the units. Focus groups were used to facilitate the data gathering for this qualitative study. Five themes were identified from the data and the program NUD*IST was used to visualize the relationships between the individual items and themes. Patient acuity was defined differently by the RNs and LPNs and is based on their reality and the realm of their mandated practice. A large category of indirect non patient related activities was found to contribute greatly to the nurses' perception of acuity. Two benefits of the study were: 1) provision of a breakdown of items nurses incorporate into their definition of acuity; 2) a list of categories to guide decision making when determining which category of staff is required to best meet the needs of the patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":80260,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of nursing leadership","volume":"12 3","pages":"18-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of nursing leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12927/cjnl.1999.19081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore how nurses on geriatric assessment inpatient units perceived patient acuity. Three questions were developed and included: what variables do nurses use to define acuity; does variation exist between and among groups of nurses; and are there nursing activities taken for granted or overlooked that can contribute to the perception of acuity? The purposive sample included all the full time and part time nurses (11 RNs, 16 LPNs) working on the units. Focus groups were used to facilitate the data gathering for this qualitative study. Five themes were identified from the data and the program NUD*IST was used to visualize the relationships between the individual items and themes. Patient acuity was defined differently by the RNs and LPNs and is based on their reality and the realm of their mandated practice. A large category of indirect non patient related activities was found to contribute greatly to the nurses' perception of acuity. Two benefits of the study were: 1) provision of a breakdown of items nurses incorporate into their definition of acuity; 2) a list of categories to guide decision making when determining which category of staff is required to best meet the needs of the patients.

护士对老年评估单位患者敏锐度的看法。
本研究的目的是探讨护士在老年评估住院单位如何感知病人的敏锐度。开发并包括三个问题:护士使用哪些变量来定义锐度;护士群体之间是否存在差异?是否有一些护理活动被认为是理所当然的或被忽视的,这些活动可能有助于敏锐的感知?目的样本包括所有在单位工作的全职和兼职护士(11名注册护士,16名执业护士)。本定性研究的数据收集采用焦点小组的方法。从数据中确定了五个主题,并使用NUD*IST程序将单个项目与主题之间的关系可视化。注册护士和执业护士对患者的敏锐度有不同的定义,这是基于他们的实际情况和他们的执业范围。大量与患者无关的间接活动对护士的敏锐度有很大的影响。该研究的两个好处是:1)提供了护士纳入其锐度定义的项目分解;2)类别清单,以指导决策,确定需要哪类工作人员最能满足患者的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书