Electrophysiological studies in mild idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome

P Girlanda, A Quartarone, S Sinicropi, C Pronestı̀, C Nicolosi, V Macaione, G Picciolo, C Messina
{"title":"Electrophysiological studies in mild idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome","authors":"P Girlanda,&nbsp;A Quartarone,&nbsp;S Sinicropi,&nbsp;C Pronestı̀,&nbsp;C Nicolosi,&nbsp;V Macaione,&nbsp;G Picciolo,&nbsp;C Messina","doi":"10.1016/S0924-980X(97)00076-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Many techniques have been reported to improve the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome<span> (CTS), but there is no agreement on the diagnostic yield of these different methods. We used an electrophysiological protocol including the assessment of the orthodromic sensory conduction velocity of the </span></span>median nerve<span><span> along the carpal tunnel, comparison of median and ulnar sensory conduction between the ring finger and wrist, short segment incremental median sensory nerve conduction<span> across the carpal tunnel recording from the III digit (`inching test'), the study of the refractory period of transmission (RPT) and calculation of the distoproximal ratio obtained by dividing the nerve conduction velocity in the median nerve between the third digit and the palm and between the palm and wrist in 41 patients with mild CTS (75 symptomatic hands) and in 45 control subjects. The distoproximal ratio calculation was the most sensitive technique (81%), but was also the least specific. The `inching test', even though less sensitive, had the advantage of localising focal abnormalities of the median nerve along the carpal tunnel. RPT was abnormal in patients with recent symptoms. Combining the different techniques, an overall sensitivity of 92% was reached, 11% higher than the yield of the single best test suggesting that a multimodal approach could be useful. The best procedure for </span></span>electrodiagnosis of mild CTS was to combine the median/ulnar comparison test with calculation of the disto-proximal ratio.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":100400,"journal":{"name":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Electromyography and Motor Control","volume":"109 1","pages":"Pages 44-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0924-980X(97)00076-3","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Electromyography and Motor Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924980X97000763","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Many techniques have been reported to improve the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), but there is no agreement on the diagnostic yield of these different methods. We used an electrophysiological protocol including the assessment of the orthodromic sensory conduction velocity of the median nerve along the carpal tunnel, comparison of median and ulnar sensory conduction between the ring finger and wrist, short segment incremental median sensory nerve conduction across the carpal tunnel recording from the III digit (`inching test'), the study of the refractory period of transmission (RPT) and calculation of the distoproximal ratio obtained by dividing the nerve conduction velocity in the median nerve between the third digit and the palm and between the palm and wrist in 41 patients with mild CTS (75 symptomatic hands) and in 45 control subjects. The distoproximal ratio calculation was the most sensitive technique (81%), but was also the least specific. The `inching test', even though less sensitive, had the advantage of localising focal abnormalities of the median nerve along the carpal tunnel. RPT was abnormal in patients with recent symptoms. Combining the different techniques, an overall sensitivity of 92% was reached, 11% higher than the yield of the single best test suggesting that a multimodal approach could be useful. The best procedure for electrodiagnosis of mild CTS was to combine the median/ulnar comparison test with calculation of the disto-proximal ratio.

轻度特发性腕管综合征的电生理研究
许多技术已被报道来提高腕管综合征(CTS)的诊断,但对这些不同方法的诊断结果尚无一致意见。我们使用了电生理方案,包括评估正中神经沿腕管的正侧感觉传导速度,比较无名指和手腕之间的正中和尺侧感觉传导,从第三个手指记录腕管的短段增量正中感觉神经传导(“点进测试”),41例轻度CTS患者(75例有症状的手)和45例对照者,用第三指与手掌之间、手掌与手腕之间正中神经的神经传导速度除以所得到的传导不应期(RPT)和计算远近端比值。远端比值计算是最敏感的技术(81%),但也是最不具体的技术。“一寸测试”虽然不那么敏感,但它在定位沿腕管的正中神经局灶性异常方面具有优势。近期出现症状的患者RPT异常。结合不同的技术,总灵敏度达到92%,比单一最佳测试的产量高11%,这表明多模式方法可能是有用的。轻度CTS的最佳电诊断方法是结合中尺比较试验和计算远端-近端比值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信