At-Risk Drinkers Use Safe Ride Services to Avoid Drinking and Driving

Barry D Caudill , Wayne M Harding , Brent A Moore
{"title":"At-Risk Drinkers Use Safe Ride Services to Avoid Drinking and Driving","authors":"Barry D Caudill ,&nbsp;Wayne M Harding ,&nbsp;Brent A Moore","doi":"10.1016/S0899-3289(00)00017-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Purpose</em>. A central question pertinent to the efficacy of safe rides (SRs) in preventing driving while intoxicated (DWI) is whether individuals at high risk for DWI use them. <em>Methods</em>. Barroom surveys (<em>N</em>=472) and in situ breath tests (<em>N</em><span>=51) were conducted as part of an assessment of an alternative transportation intervention in a Maryland community. Bivariate analyses and stepwise logistic regression were performed comparing 42 barroom respondents who reported using a SR in the last 12 months to non-users. </span><em>Results</em>. Bivariate analyses showed that SR users drank more frequently outside the home and achieved higher estimated blood alcohol concentrations (BACs) when they did. Also, they were more likely to be heavy drinkers, to have driven when feeling intoxicated, and to have been arrested for DWI. Although SR users were more likely to ride with an intoxicated driver, they were also more likely to use a designated driver (DD). Stepwise logistic regression showed SR users were more likely to be heavy drinkers and to use DDs. In situ breath test data showed SR users' BACs ranged from 0.031 to 0.248, with a mean of 0.146. <em>Implications</em>. SR programs attract drinkers at high risk for DWI. DWI prevention efforts would benefit from future research exploring how at-risk drinkers make drinking and driving decisions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73959,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance abuse","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0899-3289(00)00017-1","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance abuse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899328900000171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

Purpose. A central question pertinent to the efficacy of safe rides (SRs) in preventing driving while intoxicated (DWI) is whether individuals at high risk for DWI use them. Methods. Barroom surveys (N=472) and in situ breath tests (N=51) were conducted as part of an assessment of an alternative transportation intervention in a Maryland community. Bivariate analyses and stepwise logistic regression were performed comparing 42 barroom respondents who reported using a SR in the last 12 months to non-users. Results. Bivariate analyses showed that SR users drank more frequently outside the home and achieved higher estimated blood alcohol concentrations (BACs) when they did. Also, they were more likely to be heavy drinkers, to have driven when feeling intoxicated, and to have been arrested for DWI. Although SR users were more likely to ride with an intoxicated driver, they were also more likely to use a designated driver (DD). Stepwise logistic regression showed SR users were more likely to be heavy drinkers and to use DDs. In situ breath test data showed SR users' BACs ranged from 0.031 to 0.248, with a mean of 0.146. Implications. SR programs attract drinkers at high risk for DWI. DWI prevention efforts would benefit from future research exploring how at-risk drinkers make drinking and driving decisions.

高危饮酒者使用安全乘车服务避免酒后驾车
目的。与安全驾驶(SRs)在防止醉酒驾驶(DWI)方面的有效性相关的一个核心问题是,酒后驾车高风险的个体是否使用它们。方法。酒吧调查(N=472)和现场呼吸测试(N=51)作为马里兰州社区替代交通干预评估的一部分进行。双变量分析和逐步逻辑回归比较了42名在过去12个月内报告使用SR的酒吧受访者和未使用SR的受访者。结果。双变量分析表明,SR使用者更频繁地在家外饮酒,并且在他们这样做时获得了更高的血液酒精浓度(BACs)。此外,他们更有可能是酗酒者,在醉酒的情况下开车,以及因酒后驾车被捕。尽管SR使用者更有可能与醉酒的司机一起乘车,但他们也更有可能使用指定司机(DD)。逐步逻辑回归显示,SR使用者更有可能成为重度饮酒者和使用ddds。现场呼吸测试数据显示,SR使用者的bac范围为0.031至0.248,平均值为0.146。的影响。SR项目吸引的是酒驾风险高的饮酒者。预防酒后驾车的努力将受益于未来对高危饮酒者如何做出饮酒和驾驶决定的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信