How previous angina influences early prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction.

A Gürlek, S Turhan, T Altin, M Alpaslan, C Erol, G Pamir, D Oral
{"title":"How previous angina influences early prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction.","authors":"A Gürlek,&nbsp;S Turhan,&nbsp;T Altin,&nbsp;M Alpaslan,&nbsp;C Erol,&nbsp;G Pamir,&nbsp;D Oral","doi":"10.1177/204748730000700208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is little information about how previous angina influences the complications of myocardial infarction and also contradictory results have been reported.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the risk factors for myocardial infarction, complications, performance of left ventricle, and coronary angiography findings of patients who had suffered acute myocardial infarction with those for patients who had not.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied 600 patients diagnosed to have suffered acute myocardial infarction. Patients are grouped into those having previously had angina for at least 1 month preceding acute myocardial infarction (group I, n = 308 patients; 223 men and 85 women, mean age 60.4 +/- 10.6 years) and those who had not had angina (group II, n = 292 patients; 221 men and 71 women, mean age 58 +/- 9 years). The risk factors, complications (cardiogenic shock, heart failure, disturbances of rhythm and conduction, cardiac rupture and death), left-ventricle ejection fraction, and echocardiography and coronary angiographic findings during hospitalization are compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no difference with respect to localization of myocardial infarction (anterior, inferior, and non-Q) between groups I and II (P> 0.05). Hypertension in members of group I was higher (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference with respect to diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia and cigarette smoking (P > 0.05). Heart failure (P< 0.05), cardiogenic shock (P< 0.01), incidence of ventricular premature systole > 3/min (P< 0.001) and atrial fibrillation (P< 0.05) were seen more prevalently in group II than they were in group I. There was no difference between the two groups with respect to bundle-branch blockage and third-degree atrioventricular blockage. Incidences of ventricular fibrillation, rupture of interventricular septum (IVS) and death in hospital were higher in group II (6.2 versus 3.6%, 6.2 versus 3.2%, 2.1 versus 0.6%) but were not statistically significant. Coronary angiography detected no statistically significant difference with respect to disease in left main coronary artery, and one-vessel and two-vessel disease; but three-vessel disease was significantly more prevalent in group II (P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Heart failure, cardiogenic shock, arrhythmia (more than three VPS within 1 min and atrial fibrillation), and three-vessel disease detected by coronary angiography were found more often in the myocardial infarct patients without previous angina and these differences were statistically significant. In-hospital mortality and cardiac rupture were also found more commonly in this group and ejection fractions measured by echocardiography were found to be less, but these differences were statistically insignificant.</p>","PeriodicalId":79345,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiovascular risk","volume":"7 2","pages":"135-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/204748730000700208","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiovascular risk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/204748730000700208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: There is little information about how previous angina influences the complications of myocardial infarction and also contradictory results have been reported.

Objective: To compare the risk factors for myocardial infarction, complications, performance of left ventricle, and coronary angiography findings of patients who had suffered acute myocardial infarction with those for patients who had not.

Methods: We studied 600 patients diagnosed to have suffered acute myocardial infarction. Patients are grouped into those having previously had angina for at least 1 month preceding acute myocardial infarction (group I, n = 308 patients; 223 men and 85 women, mean age 60.4 +/- 10.6 years) and those who had not had angina (group II, n = 292 patients; 221 men and 71 women, mean age 58 +/- 9 years). The risk factors, complications (cardiogenic shock, heart failure, disturbances of rhythm and conduction, cardiac rupture and death), left-ventricle ejection fraction, and echocardiography and coronary angiographic findings during hospitalization are compared.

Results: There was no difference with respect to localization of myocardial infarction (anterior, inferior, and non-Q) between groups I and II (P> 0.05). Hypertension in members of group I was higher (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference with respect to diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia and cigarette smoking (P > 0.05). Heart failure (P< 0.05), cardiogenic shock (P< 0.01), incidence of ventricular premature systole > 3/min (P< 0.001) and atrial fibrillation (P< 0.05) were seen more prevalently in group II than they were in group I. There was no difference between the two groups with respect to bundle-branch blockage and third-degree atrioventricular blockage. Incidences of ventricular fibrillation, rupture of interventricular septum (IVS) and death in hospital were higher in group II (6.2 versus 3.6%, 6.2 versus 3.2%, 2.1 versus 0.6%) but were not statistically significant. Coronary angiography detected no statistically significant difference with respect to disease in left main coronary artery, and one-vessel and two-vessel disease; but three-vessel disease was significantly more prevalent in group II (P < 0.01).

Conclusion: Heart failure, cardiogenic shock, arrhythmia (more than three VPS within 1 min and atrial fibrillation), and three-vessel disease detected by coronary angiography were found more often in the myocardial infarct patients without previous angina and these differences were statistically significant. In-hospital mortality and cardiac rupture were also found more commonly in this group and ejection fractions measured by echocardiography were found to be less, but these differences were statistically insignificant.

既往心绞痛对急性心肌梗死患者早期预后的影响。
背景:关于既往心绞痛如何影响心肌梗死并发症的信息很少,也有相互矛盾的结果报道。目的:比较急性心肌梗死患者与非急性心肌梗死患者发生心肌梗死的危险因素、并发症、左心室表现及冠状动脉造影表现。方法:对600例确诊为急性心肌梗死的患者进行研究。患者分为急性心肌梗死前至少1个月的心绞痛患者(I组,n = 308例;223名男性和85名女性,平均年龄60.4±10.6岁)和没有心绞痛的患者(II组,n = 292例;221名男性,71名女性,平均年龄58±9岁)。比较住院期间的危险因素、并发症(心源性休克、心力衰竭、心律和传导障碍、心脏破裂和死亡)、左心室射血分数、超声心动图和冠状动脉造影结果。结果:I组与II组在心肌梗死定位(前、下、非q区)上无差异(P> 0.05)。1组成员高血压较高(P < 0.05)。在糖尿病、高胆固醇血症和吸烟方面差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。心衰(P< 0.05)、心源性休克(P< 0.01)、室性早搏> 3次/分(P< 0.001)、房颤(P< 0.05)发生率ⅱ组高于ⅰ组。束支阻塞、房室三度阻塞两组无显著性差异。II组室颤、室间隔破裂(IVS)和院内死亡的发生率较高(6.2比3.6%,6.2比3.2%,2.1比0.6%),但无统计学意义。冠状动脉造影显示左主干病变、单支病变与双支病变无统计学差异;II组三支血管病变发生率明显高于对照组(P < 0.01)。结论:无心绞痛病史的心肌梗死患者心衰、心源性休克、心律失常(1 min内超过3次VPS及房颤)、冠状动脉造影检查出的三支血管病变发生率更高,差异有统计学意义。该组的住院死亡率和心脏破裂发生率也更高,超声心动图测得的射血分数也更低,但这些差异在统计学上不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信