Heart rate recovery post-exercise as an index of parasympathetic activity

Gordon L Pierpont MD, PhD , David R Stolpman MD , Charles C Gornick MD
{"title":"Heart rate recovery post-exercise as an index of parasympathetic activity","authors":"Gordon L Pierpont MD, PhD ,&nbsp;David R Stolpman MD ,&nbsp;Charles C Gornick MD","doi":"10.1016/S0165-1838(00)00090-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The time constant (<em>T</em>) obtained by fitting post-exercise heart rate (HR) recovery to a first order exponential decay curve has been promoted as an index of parasympathetic activity. However, acceptance has been limited because reported data are inadequate to assess goodness of fit for the model, determine the best exercise protocol, or optimize the duration of post exercise monitoring. Consequently, we evaluated <em>T</em> for nine healthy volunteers (age 24–46) following treadmill exercise at maximal (max) and two stages sub-max exercise (Bruce protocol). <em>T</em> stabilized only after 3 min of post-exercise monitoring. With max exercise, <em>T</em> varied unacceptably with small changes in onset of monitoring, e.g. −16.7±16.6 (−13.2%) in the first 5 s, and residuals of the fitted curve were non-random. In contrast, sub-max exercise produced consistent <em>T</em> values, e.g. −1.9±3.2 (−4.2%) in the first 5 s, and residuals were more nearly random. In conclusion, first order decay is an inadequate model for HR recovery following max exercise, but may be reasonable for sub-max levels.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17228,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the autonomic nervous system","volume":"80 3","pages":"Pages 169-174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0165-1838(00)00090-4","citationCount":"220","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the autonomic nervous system","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165183800000904","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 220

Abstract

The time constant (T) obtained by fitting post-exercise heart rate (HR) recovery to a first order exponential decay curve has been promoted as an index of parasympathetic activity. However, acceptance has been limited because reported data are inadequate to assess goodness of fit for the model, determine the best exercise protocol, or optimize the duration of post exercise monitoring. Consequently, we evaluated T for nine healthy volunteers (age 24–46) following treadmill exercise at maximal (max) and two stages sub-max exercise (Bruce protocol). T stabilized only after 3 min of post-exercise monitoring. With max exercise, T varied unacceptably with small changes in onset of monitoring, e.g. −16.7±16.6 (−13.2%) in the first 5 s, and residuals of the fitted curve were non-random. In contrast, sub-max exercise produced consistent T values, e.g. −1.9±3.2 (−4.2%) in the first 5 s, and residuals were more nearly random. In conclusion, first order decay is an inadequate model for HR recovery following max exercise, but may be reasonable for sub-max levels.

运动后心率恢复作为副交感神经活动的指标
将运动后心率(HR)恢复拟合到一阶指数衰减曲线得到的时间常数(T)已被推广为副交感神经活动的指标。然而,由于报告的数据不足以评估模型的拟合优度,确定最佳运动方案,或优化运动后监测的持续时间,因此接受程度有限。因此,我们评估了9名健康志愿者(24-46岁)在跑步机上进行最大(最大)和两个阶段的次最大运动(布鲁斯方案)后的T。运动后监测3分钟后T稳定。在最大运动时,T随着监测开始时间的微小变化而发生不可接受的变化,例如前5秒为- 16.7±16.6(- 13.2%),并且拟合曲线的残差是非随机的。相比之下,次最大运动在前5秒产生一致的T值,例如- 1.9±3.2(- 4.2%),残差更接近随机。综上所述,对于最大运动后的心率恢复,一阶衰减模型是不充分的,但对于次最大运动水平可能是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信