Is it reasonable to use faecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening?

D Musil, J Tillich
{"title":"Is it reasonable to use faecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening?","authors":"D Musil,&nbsp;J Tillich","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a high prevalence and incidence of colorectal cancer in industrial countries. It is the commonest cancer in women after breast cancer and in men after prostate and lung cancer and one of the most common causes of death from malignant disease. The cause of colorectal cancer is unknown, thus primary-prevention programs could not be elaborated and the only occasion to reduce mortality is the use of screening to detect this cancer early. Faecal occult blood test (FOBT) was chosen for screening. Large population based trials included thousands of inhabitants of the United States and Europe to demonstrate: 1. Screening with FOBT Hemoccult II reduced mortality from colorectal cancer. 2. In the screening group the incidence of advanced stages of colorectal cancer decreased (Dukes' D stage). 3. The ideal balance between sensitivity and specificity revealed HemeSelect (immunodiagnosis of human haemoglobine) and combined test (Hemoccult II Sensa + HemeSelect). These two screening tests for colorectal cancer have not been verified by large population trials. 4. More sensitive guaiac tests decrease their own specificity and also lead to increase rate of expensive colon examinations. 5. The high-risk population for colorectal cancer ought to be submitted to screening. The problem is the detection of this group. 6. Patients' compliance to screening differs in various trials, but the percentage of patients undergoing FOBT evaluation decreases as the number of screenings increases. Therefore faecal occult blood test could be recommended for national programs of the screening for colorectal cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":75423,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis Facultatis Medicae","volume":"142 ","pages":"119-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis Facultatis Medicae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a high prevalence and incidence of colorectal cancer in industrial countries. It is the commonest cancer in women after breast cancer and in men after prostate and lung cancer and one of the most common causes of death from malignant disease. The cause of colorectal cancer is unknown, thus primary-prevention programs could not be elaborated and the only occasion to reduce mortality is the use of screening to detect this cancer early. Faecal occult blood test (FOBT) was chosen for screening. Large population based trials included thousands of inhabitants of the United States and Europe to demonstrate: 1. Screening with FOBT Hemoccult II reduced mortality from colorectal cancer. 2. In the screening group the incidence of advanced stages of colorectal cancer decreased (Dukes' D stage). 3. The ideal balance between sensitivity and specificity revealed HemeSelect (immunodiagnosis of human haemoglobine) and combined test (Hemoccult II Sensa + HemeSelect). These two screening tests for colorectal cancer have not been verified by large population trials. 4. More sensitive guaiac tests decrease their own specificity and also lead to increase rate of expensive colon examinations. 5. The high-risk population for colorectal cancer ought to be submitted to screening. The problem is the detection of this group. 6. Patients' compliance to screening differs in various trials, but the percentage of patients undergoing FOBT evaluation decreases as the number of screenings increases. Therefore faecal occult blood test could be recommended for national programs of the screening for colorectal cancer.

粪便潜血试验用于大肠癌筛查是否合理?
在工业化国家,结直肠癌的患病率和发病率都很高。它是女性中仅次于乳腺癌、男性中仅次于前列腺癌和肺癌的最常见癌症,也是恶性疾病导致死亡的最常见原因之一。结直肠癌的病因尚不清楚,因此初级预防计划无法详细阐述,降低死亡率的唯一机会是使用筛查来早期发现这种癌症。选择粪便隐血试验(FOBT)进行筛查。大量基于人口的试验包括成千上万的美国和欧洲居民来证明:1。FOBT隐匿血II筛查降低了结直肠癌的死亡率。2. 在筛查组中,晚期结直肠癌的发病率下降(Dukes' D期)。3.HemeSelect(人血红蛋白免疫诊断)和Hemoccult II Sensa + HemeSelect联合检测是敏感性和特异性之间的理想平衡。这两种结直肠癌筛查试验尚未得到大规模人群试验的证实。4. 更敏感的愈创木测试降低了其自身的特异性,也导致昂贵的结肠检查率增加。5. 结直肠癌的高危人群应该接受筛查。问题在于对这一群体的检测。6. 在不同的试验中,患者对筛查的依从性不同,但接受FOBT评估的患者百分比随着筛查次数的增加而减少。因此,建议将粪便潜血检查纳入国家大肠癌筛查方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信