Evaluation of an educational low back pain prevention program for hospital employees.

Revue du rhumatisme (English ed.) Pub Date : 1999-12-01
S Fanello, V Frampas-Chotard, Y Roquelaure, N Jousset, V Delbos, J Jarny, D Penneau-Fontbonne
{"title":"Evaluation of an educational low back pain prevention program for hospital employees.","authors":"S Fanello,&nbsp;V Frampas-Chotard,&nbsp;Y Roquelaure,&nbsp;N Jousset,&nbsp;V Delbos,&nbsp;J Jarny,&nbsp;D Penneau-Fontbonne","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the impact of an educational low back pain prevention program in a cohort of hospital employees.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort of 136 nonclerical hospital employees attended classes on safe postures and patient handling, then received advice by educators who observed them while they performed their typical workday tasks. Each of the subjects in this intervention group was matched on age, sex, and job category with a control. Musculoskeletal complaints and changes in habits during work and recreational activities were evaluated before the intervention (or the corresponding date in the control group) and after two years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the intervention group, 36% of subjects with low back pain at baseline were free of this symptom at follow-up, whereas only 26% were in the opposite situation. The proportion of subjects with low back pain episodes lasting longer than 30 days increased significantly from baseline to follow-up in the control group (from 30% to 49%) but not in the intervention group. The number of sick leaves longer than 30 days decreased significantly in the intervention group. Only 33% of the intervention group subjects felt the intervention had been helpful; this proportion varied across job categories.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data suggest that differences in job categories should be taken into account when designing educational programs for preventing low back pain. They also indicate that back school programs may be more effective in subjects with a history of low back pain, whereas instruction on safe postures and patient handling may be the best approach in subjects who have not previously experienced low back pain. Observing and providing advice to employees while they are performing their usual duties may be an essential component of low back pain prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":79371,"journal":{"name":"Revue du rhumatisme (English ed.)","volume":"66 12","pages":"711-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue du rhumatisme (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the impact of an educational low back pain prevention program in a cohort of hospital employees.

Methods: A cohort of 136 nonclerical hospital employees attended classes on safe postures and patient handling, then received advice by educators who observed them while they performed their typical workday tasks. Each of the subjects in this intervention group was matched on age, sex, and job category with a control. Musculoskeletal complaints and changes in habits during work and recreational activities were evaluated before the intervention (or the corresponding date in the control group) and after two years.

Results: In the intervention group, 36% of subjects with low back pain at baseline were free of this symptom at follow-up, whereas only 26% were in the opposite situation. The proportion of subjects with low back pain episodes lasting longer than 30 days increased significantly from baseline to follow-up in the control group (from 30% to 49%) but not in the intervention group. The number of sick leaves longer than 30 days decreased significantly in the intervention group. Only 33% of the intervention group subjects felt the intervention had been helpful; this proportion varied across job categories.

Conclusion: Our data suggest that differences in job categories should be taken into account when designing educational programs for preventing low back pain. They also indicate that back school programs may be more effective in subjects with a history of low back pain, whereas instruction on safe postures and patient handling may be the best approach in subjects who have not previously experienced low back pain. Observing and providing advice to employees while they are performing their usual duties may be an essential component of low back pain prevention.

对医院员工腰痛预防教育计划的评估。
目的:评估教育预防腰痛项目对医院员工队列的影响。方法:一组136名非文职医院员工参加了安全姿势和病人处理课程,然后接受了教育工作者的建议,这些教育工作者在他们完成典型的工作日任务时观察他们。这个干预组的每个受试者在年龄、性别和工作类别上都与对照相匹配。在干预前(或对照组的相应日期)和两年后对工作和娱乐活动期间的肌肉骨骼疾病和习惯变化进行评估。结果:在干预组中,36%基线时腰痛的受试者在随访时无此症状,而只有26%的受试者有相反的情况。从基线到随访,对照组腰痛发作持续时间超过30天的受试者比例显著增加(从30%增加到49%),但干预组没有。在干预组中,超过30天的病假数量明显减少。只有33%的干预组受试者认为干预是有帮助的;这一比例因工作类别而异。结论:我们的数据表明,在设计预防腰痛的教育方案时,应考虑到工作类别的差异。他们还指出,背部学校项目可能对有腰痛史的受试者更有效,而对以前没有经历过腰痛的受试者进行安全姿势和耐心处理的指导可能是最好的方法。当员工执行日常工作时,观察并提供建议可能是预防腰痛的重要组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信