B A O'Gara, A Abbasi, K Kaniecki, F Sarder, J Liu, L H Narine
{"title":"Pharmacological characterization of the response of the leech pharynx to acetylcholine.","authors":"B A O'Gara, A Abbasi, K Kaniecki, F Sarder, J Liu, L H Narine","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study we document the sensitivity of the leech pharynx to acetylcholine and begin to characterize the acetylcholine receptor mediating this response by examining the effects of selective cholinergic agonists and antagonists on the contractile behavior of the pharynx. The order of potency derived from the EC50 of each agonist was (+/-)epibatidine > acetylcholine (in the presence of physostigmine) >> McN A-343 >> carbachol > nicotine. However, when response amplitude was considered, the order of potency to the tested agonists was (+/-)epibatidine >> nicotine >> McN A-343 >> carbachol > acetylcholine. Acetylcholine-induced contractions of the pharynx were antagonized by d-tubocurarine, but not by alpha-bungarotoxin, alpha-conotoxin M1, or mecamylamine. Application of high concentrations of hexamethonium (1 mM) augmented the acetylcholine-induced contractions. However, this augmentation was apparently due to inhibition of acetylcholinesterase by hexamethonium. The muscarinic antagonist atropine produced complex actions and apparently acted as a mixed agonist/antagonist. Atropine by itself produced an increase in basal tonus and increased the frequency and amplitude of phasic contractions. Atropine increased the peak tension of the acetylcholine-induced response; however, it reduced the amplitude of both the acetylcholine-induced increase in basal tonus and integrated area. Based on the pharmacological profile of the pharyngeal acetylcholine response, we conclude that the acetylcholine receptor mediating the response is a nicotinic receptor. However, the responsiveness of the pharynx to muscarinic agents diverges from that of a classical nicotinic receptor.</p>","PeriodicalId":15686,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Zoology","volume":"284 7","pages":"729-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Zoology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this study we document the sensitivity of the leech pharynx to acetylcholine and begin to characterize the acetylcholine receptor mediating this response by examining the effects of selective cholinergic agonists and antagonists on the contractile behavior of the pharynx. The order of potency derived from the EC50 of each agonist was (+/-)epibatidine > acetylcholine (in the presence of physostigmine) >> McN A-343 >> carbachol > nicotine. However, when response amplitude was considered, the order of potency to the tested agonists was (+/-)epibatidine >> nicotine >> McN A-343 >> carbachol > acetylcholine. Acetylcholine-induced contractions of the pharynx were antagonized by d-tubocurarine, but not by alpha-bungarotoxin, alpha-conotoxin M1, or mecamylamine. Application of high concentrations of hexamethonium (1 mM) augmented the acetylcholine-induced contractions. However, this augmentation was apparently due to inhibition of acetylcholinesterase by hexamethonium. The muscarinic antagonist atropine produced complex actions and apparently acted as a mixed agonist/antagonist. Atropine by itself produced an increase in basal tonus and increased the frequency and amplitude of phasic contractions. Atropine increased the peak tension of the acetylcholine-induced response; however, it reduced the amplitude of both the acetylcholine-induced increase in basal tonus and integrated area. Based on the pharmacological profile of the pharyngeal acetylcholine response, we conclude that the acetylcholine receptor mediating the response is a nicotinic receptor. However, the responsiveness of the pharynx to muscarinic agents diverges from that of a classical nicotinic receptor.