Colon polyp registries and colorectal cancer control.

R Lev, J Healey
{"title":"Colon polyp registries and colorectal cancer control.","authors":"R Lev,&nbsp;J Healey","doi":"10.1046/j.1525-1500.1999.99054.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This cohort of 252 subjects in the Roger Williams Hospital Polyp Registry who had adenomatous polyps removed in 1990, was followed for 6 years. Thirty subjects died during that period. Follow-up rate for the 222 living patients (88.1% of total) was 85%. New adenomatous polyps were found in 59% of the endoscoped subjects. Risk factors for new polyps included family history of colorectal carcinoma (p = 0.00079), right-sided location (p = 0.0108), and (probably) prior adenomatous polyps (p = 0.0595). In addition, three colorectal carcinomas, two of which were Dukes stage A, were found 1, 1, and 6 years after index polypectomy. If, as is common practice, the two first-year cancers are excluded, the observed incidence of metachronous colorectal cancer was 0.8/1000 patient years, which is substantially less than the expected incidence of such carcinomas in reference populations. Compared to the 1984 and 1987 cohorts in the polyp registry, colonoscopy was used more frequently and sigmoidoscopy less so for surveillance. Within the sigmoidoscopy group, the flexible instrument continued to rise in popularity as compared with rigid sigmoidoscopy. In addition to helping reduce the incidence of metachronous colorectal carcinomas, the polyp registry also serves the educational function of sensitizing physicians and their patients to the need to detect and treat these premalignant lesions. Enrollees in the registry also provide a source for studies designed to evaluate possible inhibitory effects of dietary, chemopreventive, and other agents on colorectal neoplasias.</p>","PeriodicalId":9499,"journal":{"name":"Cancer detection and prevention","volume":"23 6","pages":"474-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer detection and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1500.1999.99054.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This cohort of 252 subjects in the Roger Williams Hospital Polyp Registry who had adenomatous polyps removed in 1990, was followed for 6 years. Thirty subjects died during that period. Follow-up rate for the 222 living patients (88.1% of total) was 85%. New adenomatous polyps were found in 59% of the endoscoped subjects. Risk factors for new polyps included family history of colorectal carcinoma (p = 0.00079), right-sided location (p = 0.0108), and (probably) prior adenomatous polyps (p = 0.0595). In addition, three colorectal carcinomas, two of which were Dukes stage A, were found 1, 1, and 6 years after index polypectomy. If, as is common practice, the two first-year cancers are excluded, the observed incidence of metachronous colorectal cancer was 0.8/1000 patient years, which is substantially less than the expected incidence of such carcinomas in reference populations. Compared to the 1984 and 1987 cohorts in the polyp registry, colonoscopy was used more frequently and sigmoidoscopy less so for surveillance. Within the sigmoidoscopy group, the flexible instrument continued to rise in popularity as compared with rigid sigmoidoscopy. In addition to helping reduce the incidence of metachronous colorectal carcinomas, the polyp registry also serves the educational function of sensitizing physicians and their patients to the need to detect and treat these premalignant lesions. Enrollees in the registry also provide a source for studies designed to evaluate possible inhibitory effects of dietary, chemopreventive, and other agents on colorectal neoplasias.

结肠息肉登记和结直肠癌控制。
在罗杰威廉姆斯医院息肉登记处,于1990年切除腺瘤性息肉的252名受试者,随访6年。30名受试者在此期间死亡。222例存活患者随访率为85%,占88.1%。内窥镜检查对象中有59%发现新的腺瘤性息肉。新发息肉的危险因素包括结直肠癌家族史(p = 0.00079)、右侧发病(p = 0.0108)和(可能)既往有腺瘤性息肉(p = 0.0595)。此外,在指数息肉切除术后1年、1年和6年发现3例结直肠癌,其中2例为Dukes A期。如果按照惯例,排除这两种第一年的癌症,观察到的异时性结直肠癌的发病率为0.8/1000患者年,这大大低于参考人群中此类癌症的预期发病率。与1984年和1987年息肉登记组相比,结肠镜检查的使用频率更高,乙状结肠镜检查的使用频率更低。在乙状结肠镜组中,与刚性乙状结肠镜相比,柔性器械继续上升。除了帮助减少异时性结直肠癌的发病率外,息肉登记处还具有教育功能,使医生及其患者认识到检测和治疗这些癌前病变的必要性。登记的参与者也为评估饮食、化学预防和其他药物对结直肠肿瘤可能的抑制作用的研究提供了一个来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信