A back school program at the Toulouse-Purpan teaching hospital. Evaluation of 144 patients.

Abstract

Unlabelled: This article reports our experience with a five-day back school program focusing on active exercises, safe lifting, and occupational therapy.

Patients and methods: The medical charts of 144 back school patients were reviewed retrospectively. Age, gender, type of low back pain, radiological findings, impact on work and psychological well-being, surgical history, and history of prior back school experience were recorded on the first and last back school session days (D1 and D5), after six months (M6), and after 12 months (M12). Efficacy was evaluated based on the number of days off work, Schöber's index, a visual analog scale pain score, and scores evaluating the active exercise, safe lifting, and occupational therapy techniques taught during the back school course.

Results: All evaluation scores were significantly better on D5 than on D1. This effect was sustained over time. The pain score fell by 50% between D1 and D5 (32.6 +/- 23.1 versus 16.3 +/- 18.5) and remained low at M6 and M12 (18.1 +/- 19.5 and 14.8 +/- 19.3) The number of days off work fell dramatically from baseline to M6 (51.2 +/- 63.8 vs 9.8 +/- 38.8) and remained low at M12. Forty-four patients were lost-to-follow-up between D5 and M6.

Conclusion: Back school interventions are helpful in preventing recurrences of low back pain. Our promising data deserve to be confirmed in a larger study involving quality of life assessments, determination of the number of physician visits for low back pain during the M0-M6 and M6-M12 periods, and a comprehensive evaluation after 18 months.