Comparison of adjuvants with Leishmania antigens in a guinea pig model to induce delayed-type hypersensitivity responses.

Laboratory animal science Pub Date : 1999-10-01
E J Briand, G R Ruble, J Stiteler, L D Harris, J R Burge, E T Soranaka, G Glenn, F Quance-Fitch, E D Rowton
{"title":"Comparison of adjuvants with Leishmania antigens in a guinea pig model to induce delayed-type hypersensitivity responses.","authors":"E J Briand,&nbsp;G R Ruble,&nbsp;J Stiteler,&nbsp;L D Harris,&nbsp;J R Burge,&nbsp;E T Soranaka,&nbsp;G Glenn,&nbsp;F Quance-Fitch,&nbsp;E D Rowton","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Guinea pigs have been a traditional model for studies of delayed-type hypersensitivity. They are the natural host of Leishmania enriettii and have been experimentally infected with other species of Leishmania. They have been used as a skin-test model to screen potential antigens for use in diagnostic tests for Leishmania. Use of complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA), along with whole promastigote Leishmania antigen, was necessary to sensitize guinea pigs to invoke a sufficient cell-mediated immune response. However, use of CFA has come under scrutiny by Animal Care and Use Committees due to the pathologic changes associated with its use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-two specific-pathogen-free male Hartley guinea pigs were inoculated with Leishmania antigens alone or mixed with one of three adjuvants (CFA, TiterMax, and liposomes), and were skin tested 2 weeks later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the Leishmania antigens tested, guinea pigs that received liposomes as an adjuvant had skin-test responses comparable to those of guinea pigs that received CFA. TiterMax was also tested, but cellular responses at antigen test sites were poor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Liposomes can be used in this model as a safe, effective adjuvant.</p>","PeriodicalId":17937,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory animal science","volume":"49 5","pages":"519-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory animal science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Guinea pigs have been a traditional model for studies of delayed-type hypersensitivity. They are the natural host of Leishmania enriettii and have been experimentally infected with other species of Leishmania. They have been used as a skin-test model to screen potential antigens for use in diagnostic tests for Leishmania. Use of complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA), along with whole promastigote Leishmania antigen, was necessary to sensitize guinea pigs to invoke a sufficient cell-mediated immune response. However, use of CFA has come under scrutiny by Animal Care and Use Committees due to the pathologic changes associated with its use.

Methods: Thirty-two specific-pathogen-free male Hartley guinea pigs were inoculated with Leishmania antigens alone or mixed with one of three adjuvants (CFA, TiterMax, and liposomes), and were skin tested 2 weeks later.

Results: For the Leishmania antigens tested, guinea pigs that received liposomes as an adjuvant had skin-test responses comparable to those of guinea pigs that received CFA. TiterMax was also tested, but cellular responses at antigen test sites were poor.

Conclusions: Liposomes can be used in this model as a safe, effective adjuvant.

佐剂与利什曼原虫抗原在豚鼠模型中诱导延迟型超敏反应的比较。
背景与目的:豚鼠一直是研究延迟型超敏反应的传统模型。它们是恩利什曼原虫的天然宿主,并被实验感染了其他种类的利什曼原虫。它们已被用作皮肤试验模型,以筛选用于利什曼原虫诊断试验的潜在抗原。使用完全的弗氏佐剂(CFA)和整个利什曼原虫原鞭毛菌抗原是必要的,以使豚鼠致敏,以引起足够的细胞介导的免疫反应。然而,由于与使用CFA相关的病理变化,CFA的使用受到动物护理和使用委员会的审查。方法:将32只无特异性病原体的雄性哈特利豚鼠单独接种利什曼原虫抗原或与三种佐剂(CFA、TiterMax和脂质体)中的一种混合接种,2周后进行皮肤试验。结果:对于利什曼原虫抗原测试,接受脂质体作为佐剂的豚鼠皮肤试验反应与接受CFA的豚鼠相当。TiterMax也进行了检测,但抗原检测部位的细胞反应较差。结论:脂质体可作为一种安全有效的佐剂用于该模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信