Understanding the impact of power in organizations.

Seminars for nurse managers Pub Date : 1999-03-01
C King, A Koliner
{"title":"Understanding the impact of power in organizations.","authors":"C King,&nbsp;A Koliner","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although implementation of Shared Governance appears to have failed, it failed primarily on the surface. Many staff nurses actively involved in the Shared Governance movement not only were empowered but were dramatically affected on a professional level. Several council chairpersons were empowered to assume management roles in the transition back to the hierarchial model--a manifestation of their professional growth and development. At the unit level, several units lobbied the new leadership to allow them to continue to do peer review and unit-based council management of unit governance issues. Three councils lobbied to continue to do their work, although in a modified role, in the reestablished hierarchial structure. The three remaining councils were those of Practice, Quality, and Research. If nurse leaders at any level within the organization are to guide their departments forward while in the throes of the current chaos in health care, they must develop and use their power bases, both formal and informal, as individuals and then as leaders. Russell Coile identifies the need for more clinical expertise (expert power) on the executive team of health care organizations. He predicts that 50% of the executive team will be nurses and physicians and that only health care executives with an MBA or financial backgrounds, who also have well-developed informal power bases with skills in relationship development, facilitation, and networking, will be part of the new system. Those with a diversified informal power base will be most successful in guiding their organization to its destination. The future for nursing leaders is in the sharing of information; it is about embracing diversity and recognizing the contributions others can make that are refreshingly different; it is also about clearly defining a balance in life, because balanced leaders who have found a way to nurture and meet their own needs are better positioned to do the same for others. Ultimately, understanding the impact of power in an organization, regardless of organizational structure, begins with understanding and defining your own power base.</p>","PeriodicalId":79376,"journal":{"name":"Seminars for nurse managers","volume":"7 1","pages":"39-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars for nurse managers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although implementation of Shared Governance appears to have failed, it failed primarily on the surface. Many staff nurses actively involved in the Shared Governance movement not only were empowered but were dramatically affected on a professional level. Several council chairpersons were empowered to assume management roles in the transition back to the hierarchial model--a manifestation of their professional growth and development. At the unit level, several units lobbied the new leadership to allow them to continue to do peer review and unit-based council management of unit governance issues. Three councils lobbied to continue to do their work, although in a modified role, in the reestablished hierarchial structure. The three remaining councils were those of Practice, Quality, and Research. If nurse leaders at any level within the organization are to guide their departments forward while in the throes of the current chaos in health care, they must develop and use their power bases, both formal and informal, as individuals and then as leaders. Russell Coile identifies the need for more clinical expertise (expert power) on the executive team of health care organizations. He predicts that 50% of the executive team will be nurses and physicians and that only health care executives with an MBA or financial backgrounds, who also have well-developed informal power bases with skills in relationship development, facilitation, and networking, will be part of the new system. Those with a diversified informal power base will be most successful in guiding their organization to its destination. The future for nursing leaders is in the sharing of information; it is about embracing diversity and recognizing the contributions others can make that are refreshingly different; it is also about clearly defining a balance in life, because balanced leaders who have found a way to nurture and meet their own needs are better positioned to do the same for others. Ultimately, understanding the impact of power in an organization, regardless of organizational structure, begins with understanding and defining your own power base.

理解权力在组织中的影响。
尽管共享治理的实施似乎失败了,但它主要是在表面上失败的。许多积极参与“共享治理”运动的护士不仅获得了授权,而且在专业水平上受到了巨大影响。几位理事会主席被授权在向等级模式过渡的过程中承担管理角色——这是他们专业成长和发展的体现。在单位层面,几个单位游说新的领导允许他们继续做同行评审和单位为基础的委员会管理单位治理问题。三个委员会进行了游说,希望在重新建立的等级结构中,尽管角色有所改变,但仍能继续开展工作。剩下的三个委员会分别是实践委员会、质量委员会和研究委员会。如果组织内任何级别的护士领导要在当前卫生保健混乱的阵痛中指导他们的部门前进,他们必须发展和利用他们的权力基础,无论是正式的还是非正式的,无论是作为个人还是作为领导。Russell Coile指出,医疗保健组织的执行团队需要更多的临床专业知识(专家权力)。他预测,管理团队中50%的人将是护士和医生,而且只有拥有MBA学位或金融背景的医疗管理人员,以及在关系发展、促进和网络方面拥有良好非正式权力基础的人才会成为新体系的一部分。那些拥有多样化非正式权力基础的人将最成功地引导他们的组织到达目的地。护理领导者的未来在于信息共享;它是关于拥抱多样性,并认识到其他人可以做出的令人耳目一新的不同贡献;这也是关于明确定义生活中的平衡,因为平衡的领导者如果找到了培养和满足自己需求的方法,就能更好地为他人做同样的事情。最终,无论组织结构如何,要理解权力在组织中的影响,首先要理解和定义自己的权力基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信