Issues and opportunities in the regulation of home health care

Abstract

Recent federal legislation established a Certificate of Need (CON) process by which health care providers must receive state approval before building or renovating a facility, or adding a new service. Certainly, strict regulation of cost and quality of home health care is needed, but it is asserted that CON is an ineffective way of organizing the delivery of services and limiting costs, and furthermore, that CON is biased in favor of institutionally-based providers and maintenance of the status quo. The authors feel that vested interests have a history of trying to use earlier state CON regulations to control their turf, limit competition, and consequently stifle innovation. Home health care should be incorporated into national health planning goals and integrated into state and regional health plans. Such planning must precede CON regulations and should not be confused with it.

Alternatives to CON can achieve quality service and moderate costs and include licensing of personnel, standards for provider accreditation, and utilization review. Planning for these alternatives should begin now to avoid fragmented expansion of home health care. Evidence suggests a comprehensive use of home health care as a cost-effective alternative for many levels of care given in hospitals and nursing homes.