Institutionalization of programs in medical education

Edwin F. Rosinski, Fred Dagenais
{"title":"Institutionalization of programs in medical education","authors":"Edwin F. Rosinski,&nbsp;Fred Dagenais","doi":"10.1016/0165-2281(81)90011-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Through the use of questionnaires and interview schedules during extended site visits, sixteen programs training residents in non-family medicine primary care were studied to determine what factors contributed to program success — known as “institutionalization” — or to program failure. The findings revealed that programs were initiated for either philosophic or pragmatic money reasons. For programs to begin, to continue, and to be institutionalized was due to several contributing key factors. These included the resolution of programmatic differences in regard to goals; development of a substantive quality program; presence of forceful and respected leadership; tangible support of the administration and key academic departments; commitment of the teaching staff; anticipation of potential conflicts; participation of the involved lay and professional community; and the availability of some continued funding. The study also revealed that one program was a complete failure and had to be aborted because none of the key factors were present. The study concluded that the best way for institutionalization to occur is to assure that sound and comprehensive planning takes place. With thorough and anticipatory planning, the conditions essential to program institutionalization can be met more easily.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79937,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and education","volume":"2 2","pages":"Pages 127-133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0165-2281(81)90011-4","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health policy and education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0165228181900114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Through the use of questionnaires and interview schedules during extended site visits, sixteen programs training residents in non-family medicine primary care were studied to determine what factors contributed to program success — known as “institutionalization” — or to program failure. The findings revealed that programs were initiated for either philosophic or pragmatic money reasons. For programs to begin, to continue, and to be institutionalized was due to several contributing key factors. These included the resolution of programmatic differences in regard to goals; development of a substantive quality program; presence of forceful and respected leadership; tangible support of the administration and key academic departments; commitment of the teaching staff; anticipation of potential conflicts; participation of the involved lay and professional community; and the availability of some continued funding. The study also revealed that one program was a complete failure and had to be aborted because none of the key factors were present. The study concluded that the best way for institutionalization to occur is to assure that sound and comprehensive planning takes place. With thorough and anticipatory planning, the conditions essential to program institutionalization can be met more easily.

医学教育项目的制度化
通过在延长的实地考察中使用问卷调查和访谈时间表,研究了16个培训非家庭医学初级保健住院医师的项目,以确定哪些因素导致了项目的成功(称为“制度化”)或项目的失败。调查结果显示,这些项目要么是出于哲学上的原因,要么是出于实用的金钱原因。项目的开始、继续和制度化是由几个关键因素造成的。其中包括解决有关目标的方案差异;制定实质性的质量计划;有强有力和受人尊敬的领导;行政部门和重点学术部门的切实支持;教师的承诺;对潜在冲突的预期;有关的非专业人士和专业人士的参与;以及一些持续资金的可用性。该研究还揭示了一个项目是完全失败的,不得不中止,因为没有关键因素存在。这项研究的结论是,实现机构化的最佳方式是确保进行健全和全面的规划。通过周密和前瞻性的规划,可以更容易地满足方案制度化的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信