A controlled comparison of two different clinical grade devices for CD34+ cell selection of autologous blood stem cell grafts.

B Björkstrand, B Sundman-Engberg, B Christensson, G Kumlien
{"title":"A controlled comparison of two different clinical grade devices for CD34+ cell selection of autologous blood stem cell grafts.","authors":"B Björkstrand,&nbsp;B Sundman-Engberg,&nbsp;B Christensson,&nbsp;G Kumlien","doi":"10.1089/106161299320596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Six patients who were to undergo autologous PBSC transplantation with positively selected CD34+ cells were included in this study to compare the efficiency of two devices for clinical grade stem cell selection, the Isolex 300i (Baxter, Munich, Germany) and CEPRATE SC (CellPro, Bothell, WA). PBSC were mobilized by chemotherapy and G-CSF and were collected by leukapheresis on a CS3000 cell separator on 2 consecutive days. The two apheresis products were pooled for CD34 selection. The pooled apheresis products from each patient were divided into two equal portions to be separated on each of the two devices. Cell selection was performed according to the manufacturers' instructions. Enumeration of CD34+ cells was performed by flow cytometry using the HPCA-2 MAb. Purity and yield were significantly better with Isolex than with CEPRATE. Median purity was 93.0% (range 80%-98%) for Isolex and 61.5% (range 27%-72%) for CEPRATE (p = 0.03); median yields for Isolex and for CEPRATE were 48.0% (range 18%-73%) and 23.0% (range 17%-29%), respectively (p = 0.03). The number of CD34+ cells/kg body weight was also significantly higher with Isolex (median 3.8x10(6), range 1.7-5.2) compared with CEPRATE (median 2.35x10(6), range 0.7-4.3) (p = 0.03). Thus, the Isolex 300i device gave products of higher purity and recovered a higher proportion of the CD34+ cells in the harvest before separation. The yield was still poor with both devices, however, and further optimization of the technique for clinical grade stem cell selection is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":77208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hematotherapy","volume":"8 1","pages":"75-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/106161299320596","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hematotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/106161299320596","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Six patients who were to undergo autologous PBSC transplantation with positively selected CD34+ cells were included in this study to compare the efficiency of two devices for clinical grade stem cell selection, the Isolex 300i (Baxter, Munich, Germany) and CEPRATE SC (CellPro, Bothell, WA). PBSC were mobilized by chemotherapy and G-CSF and were collected by leukapheresis on a CS3000 cell separator on 2 consecutive days. The two apheresis products were pooled for CD34 selection. The pooled apheresis products from each patient were divided into two equal portions to be separated on each of the two devices. Cell selection was performed according to the manufacturers' instructions. Enumeration of CD34+ cells was performed by flow cytometry using the HPCA-2 MAb. Purity and yield were significantly better with Isolex than with CEPRATE. Median purity was 93.0% (range 80%-98%) for Isolex and 61.5% (range 27%-72%) for CEPRATE (p = 0.03); median yields for Isolex and for CEPRATE were 48.0% (range 18%-73%) and 23.0% (range 17%-29%), respectively (p = 0.03). The number of CD34+ cells/kg body weight was also significantly higher with Isolex (median 3.8x10(6), range 1.7-5.2) compared with CEPRATE (median 2.35x10(6), range 0.7-4.3) (p = 0.03). Thus, the Isolex 300i device gave products of higher purity and recovered a higher proportion of the CD34+ cells in the harvest before separation. The yield was still poor with both devices, however, and further optimization of the technique for clinical grade stem cell selection is warranted.

两种不同临床级别设备在自体造血干细胞移植中CD34+细胞选择的对照比较。
本研究包括6名接受自体外周血干细胞移植的阳性选择CD34+细胞的患者,以比较两种用于临床级干细胞选择的设备的效率,Isolex 300i (Baxter, Munich, Germany)和CEPRATE SC (CellPro, Bothell, WA)。通过化疗和G-CSF动员PBSC,连续2天在CS3000细胞分离器上进行白细胞分离。将两种分离产物合并用于CD34的选择。从每位患者收集的血浆产品被分成两等份,分别在两台设备上分离。根据制造商的说明进行细胞选择。流式细胞术采用HPCA-2单抗对CD34+细胞进行计数。Isolex的纯度和收率明显优于CEPRATE。Isolex的中位纯度为93.0%(范围80%-98%),CEPRATE的中位纯度为61.5%(范围27%-72%)(p = 0.03);Isolex和CEPRATE的中位产率分别为48.0%(18%-73%)和23.0% (17%-29%)(p = 0.03)。与CEPRATE(中位数2.35x10(6),范围0.7-4.3)相比,Isolex(中位数3.8x10(6), CD34+细胞/kg体重的数量也显著高于CEPRATE(中位数2.35x10(6),范围1.7-5.2)(p = 0.03)。因此,Isolex 300i设备提供了更高纯度的产品,并在分离前回收了更高比例的CD34+细胞。然而,两种设备的产率仍然很差,进一步优化临床级干细胞选择技术是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书