Use of reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for carcinoembryonic antigen, cytokeratin 19, and maspin in the detection of tumor cells in leukapheresis products from patients with breast cancer: comparison with immunocytochemistry.

J A López-Guerrero, P B Gilabert, E B González, M A Sanz Alonso, J P Pérez, A S Talens, E A Oraval, J de la Rubia Comos, S B Boix
{"title":"Use of reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for carcinoembryonic antigen, cytokeratin 19, and maspin in the detection of tumor cells in leukapheresis products from patients with breast cancer: comparison with immunocytochemistry.","authors":"J A López-Guerrero,&nbsp;P B Gilabert,&nbsp;E B González,&nbsp;M A Sanz Alonso,&nbsp;J P Pérez,&nbsp;A S Talens,&nbsp;E A Oraval,&nbsp;J de la Rubia Comos,&nbsp;S B Boix","doi":"10.1089/106161299320578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluates the role of reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin 19 (CK19), and maspin transcripts to identify breast cancer cells (BCC) in leukapheresis products (LP) collected from breast cancer (BC) patients and compares these results with those obtained using immunocytochemistry (IC). Eighty-four LP obtained from 33 patients with stage II-III BC and control subjects without BC were screened for the presence of BCC by IC and CK19, CEA, and maspin expression using RT-PCR. CEA RT-PCR and IC were the only specific markers, as no false positives were detected in any patients without BC. CK19 RT-PCR gave 11% false positives, whereas maspin RT-PCR with 25% was the most unspecific marker. In LP from BC patients, positive results were observed in 70% and 63% for CK19 and CEA RT-PCR, respectively. For maspin RT-PCR, this percentage was 22%, and for IC it was 17%. There was a good correlation between the CEA and CK19 RT-PCR (p = 0.018). No correlation between CEA and CK19 RT-PCR and IC was found, and although 5 of the 6 IC+ samples were CEA+/CK19+, great discrepancies in the group of IC- samples were observed. Our data suggest that RT-PCR assays for CEA and, to a lesser extent, for CK19 have more sensitivity and specificity than IC to detect BCC in LP.</p>","PeriodicalId":77208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hematotherapy","volume":"8 1","pages":"53-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/106161299320578","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hematotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/106161299320578","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

Abstract

This study evaluates the role of reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin 19 (CK19), and maspin transcripts to identify breast cancer cells (BCC) in leukapheresis products (LP) collected from breast cancer (BC) patients and compares these results with those obtained using immunocytochemistry (IC). Eighty-four LP obtained from 33 patients with stage II-III BC and control subjects without BC were screened for the presence of BCC by IC and CK19, CEA, and maspin expression using RT-PCR. CEA RT-PCR and IC were the only specific markers, as no false positives were detected in any patients without BC. CK19 RT-PCR gave 11% false positives, whereas maspin RT-PCR with 25% was the most unspecific marker. In LP from BC patients, positive results were observed in 70% and 63% for CK19 and CEA RT-PCR, respectively. For maspin RT-PCR, this percentage was 22%, and for IC it was 17%. There was a good correlation between the CEA and CK19 RT-PCR (p = 0.018). No correlation between CEA and CK19 RT-PCR and IC was found, and although 5 of the 6 IC+ samples were CEA+/CK19+, great discrepancies in the group of IC- samples were observed. Our data suggest that RT-PCR assays for CEA and, to a lesser extent, for CK19 have more sensitivity and specificity than IC to detect BCC in LP.

应用逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测癌胚抗原、细胞角蛋白19和巨噬蛋白检测乳腺癌患者白细胞分离产品中的肿瘤细胞:与免疫细胞化学的比较
本研究评估了逆转录酶聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测癌胚抗原(CEA)、细胞角蛋白19 (CK19)和巨噬蛋白转录本在乳腺癌(BC)患者采集的白细胞分离产品(LP)中识别乳腺癌细胞(BCC)的作用,并将这些结果与免疫细胞化学(IC)获得的结果进行了比较。从33例II-III期BC患者和未患BC的对照组中获得84例LP,采用RT-PCR方法通过IC和CK19、CEA和maspin表达来筛选BCC的存在。CEA RT-PCR和IC是唯一的特异性标志物,因为在没有BC的患者中没有检测到假阳性。CK19 RT-PCR的假阳性率为11%,而maspin RT-PCR的假阳性率为25%,是最不特异性的标记。在BC患者的LP中,CK19和CEA RT-PCR的阳性结果分别为70%和63%。对于maspin RT-PCR,这一比例为22%,对于IC,这一比例为17%。CEA与CK19 RT-PCR有良好的相关性(p = 0.018)。CEA和CK19 RT-PCR与IC无相关性,6个IC+样本中有5个为CEA+/CK19+,但IC-样本组差异较大。我们的数据表明,RT-PCR检测CEA和CK19(在较小程度上)比IC检测LP中的BCC具有更高的敏感性和特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书