Validation of the Nordic flow cytometry standard for CD34+ cell enumeration in blood and autografts: report from the third workshop. Nordic Stem Cell Laboratory Group.

H E Johnsen, J Baech, K Nikolajsen
{"title":"Validation of the Nordic flow cytometry standard for CD34+ cell enumeration in blood and autografts: report from the third workshop. Nordic Stem Cell Laboratory Group.","authors":"H E Johnsen,&nbsp;J Baech,&nbsp;K Nikolajsen","doi":"10.1089/106161299320532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Following two workshops on standardization of enumeration of CD34+ cells in blood and leukapheresis products, the Nordic Stem Cell Laboratory Group (NSCL-G) evaluated the Milan/Mulhouse/Nordic standard in clinical practice during the third workshop (WS-III). This report documents an acceptable interlaboratory variation in the most clinically active laboratories, with a coefficient of variation (CV) below 0.19 in 7 of 8 analyses performed. The introduction of a pan-CD45 antibody in the analysis did not improve the CV. Comparison of two different CD34 class II antibodies on a total of 99 samples and procedures with and without washing on a total of 96 samples revealed a significant correlation (r2 >0.99) for all analyses. Finally, subset analysis of uncommitted and lineage-specific progenitors revealed major gating difficulties, indicating that further improvements are necessary. In an analysis of more than 600 patients undergoing mobilization and harvest of blood progenitors, with about 500 patients autografted, we found a significant correlation between blood levels of CD34+ cells and recovery of CD34+ cells from each harvest as well as between CD34+ cell number reinfused and time to neutrophil and platelet recovery. This report documents for the first time that the very simple Milan/Mulhouse method (termed The Nordic Standard) can be used by a group of laboratories to obtain important clinical information. Consequently, we consider this method as the conventional method in quality assessment of autografts, which should provide a benchmark for development of second-generation improvements.</p>","PeriodicalId":77208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hematotherapy","volume":"8 1","pages":"15-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/106161299320532","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hematotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/106161299320532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Following two workshops on standardization of enumeration of CD34+ cells in blood and leukapheresis products, the Nordic Stem Cell Laboratory Group (NSCL-G) evaluated the Milan/Mulhouse/Nordic standard in clinical practice during the third workshop (WS-III). This report documents an acceptable interlaboratory variation in the most clinically active laboratories, with a coefficient of variation (CV) below 0.19 in 7 of 8 analyses performed. The introduction of a pan-CD45 antibody in the analysis did not improve the CV. Comparison of two different CD34 class II antibodies on a total of 99 samples and procedures with and without washing on a total of 96 samples revealed a significant correlation (r2 >0.99) for all analyses. Finally, subset analysis of uncommitted and lineage-specific progenitors revealed major gating difficulties, indicating that further improvements are necessary. In an analysis of more than 600 patients undergoing mobilization and harvest of blood progenitors, with about 500 patients autografted, we found a significant correlation between blood levels of CD34+ cells and recovery of CD34+ cells from each harvest as well as between CD34+ cell number reinfused and time to neutrophil and platelet recovery. This report documents for the first time that the very simple Milan/Mulhouse method (termed The Nordic Standard) can be used by a group of laboratories to obtain important clinical information. Consequently, we consider this method as the conventional method in quality assessment of autografts, which should provide a benchmark for development of second-generation improvements.

血液和自体移植物中CD34+细胞计数北欧流式细胞术标准的验证:第三次研讨会报告北欧干细胞实验室小组。
继两次关于血液和白细胞分离产品中CD34+细胞计数标准化的研讨会之后,北欧干细胞实验室小组(nsclc - g)在第三次研讨会(WS-III)期间评估了米兰/米卢斯/北欧标准在临床实践中的应用。该报告记录了在大多数临床活跃的实验室中可接受的实验室间差异,在进行的8次分析中,有7次的变异系数(CV)低于0.19。在分析中引入泛cd45抗体并没有改善CV。在总共99个样本上比较两种不同的CD34 II类抗体,以及在总共96个样本上清洗和不清洗的方法,所有分析结果都显示出显著的相关性(r2 >0.99)。最后,对未提交和谱系特异性祖细胞的子集分析揭示了主要的门控困难,表明进一步的改进是必要的。在对600多名接受动员和采集血液祖细胞的患者(其中约500名患者进行了自体移植)的分析中,我们发现血液中CD34+细胞水平与每次采集的CD34+细胞回收率之间存在显著相关性,再输注的CD34+细胞数量与中性粒细胞和血小板恢复时间之间存在显著相关性。该报告首次证明了非常简单的Milan/Mulhouse方法(称为北欧标准)可被一组实验室用于获取重要的临床信息。因此,我们认为该方法是评估自体移植物质量的常规方法,为第二代改进的发展提供了基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书