Taking charge of health: an educational intervention for patients and staff.

D Sadow, M Ryder, M M Chick
{"title":"Taking charge of health: an educational intervention for patients and staff.","authors":"D Sadow,&nbsp;M Ryder,&nbsp;M M Chick","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Attitudes about attributing health effects to oneself (internal locus of control on health issues), as opposed to fate, chance, or powerful others, have resulted in improved health behavior and treatment outcome. Although this construct has been researched among patients and self-efficacy has been studied for patients and nurses, changes in internal health control beliefs among staff following specific empowering interactions have not been studied. Psychiatric nursing students at Middlesex Community College took part in one of three types of practicum experiences: a psychoeducation practicum with psychiatric patients utilizing \"empowering\" learning principles, a traditional psychiatric placement, or a medical-surgical placement. The Achterberg and Lawlis Health Attribution Test was administered to all groups, before and after the clinical placement. The psychoeducation group evidenced a significant rise in internality following the placement; other groups did not experience this change. Specifically, after being involved in an empowering educational experience, the nurses themselves attributed more power to the patient for maintaining good health rather than to doctors and other health staff, or to fate. These nurses saw the patient as more powerful and empowered. Scales that measured attribution of causality to \"powerful others\" (such as doctors, etc.) or to just \"chance\" (such as \"it was my fate--these things happen\"), were stable across administrations of the test. Implications for educational and medical communities were discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":79669,"journal":{"name":"Journal of healthcare education and training : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Education and Training","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of healthcare education and training : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Attitudes about attributing health effects to oneself (internal locus of control on health issues), as opposed to fate, chance, or powerful others, have resulted in improved health behavior and treatment outcome. Although this construct has been researched among patients and self-efficacy has been studied for patients and nurses, changes in internal health control beliefs among staff following specific empowering interactions have not been studied. Psychiatric nursing students at Middlesex Community College took part in one of three types of practicum experiences: a psychoeducation practicum with psychiatric patients utilizing "empowering" learning principles, a traditional psychiatric placement, or a medical-surgical placement. The Achterberg and Lawlis Health Attribution Test was administered to all groups, before and after the clinical placement. The psychoeducation group evidenced a significant rise in internality following the placement; other groups did not experience this change. Specifically, after being involved in an empowering educational experience, the nurses themselves attributed more power to the patient for maintaining good health rather than to doctors and other health staff, or to fate. These nurses saw the patient as more powerful and empowered. Scales that measured attribution of causality to "powerful others" (such as doctors, etc.) or to just "chance" (such as "it was my fate--these things happen"), were stable across administrations of the test. Implications for educational and medical communities were discussed.

负责健康:对病人和工作人员的教育干预。
将健康影响归因于自己(健康问题的内在控制点),而不是命运、机遇或强大的他人,这种态度导致了健康行为和治疗结果的改善。虽然这一结构已经在患者中进行了研究,并且对患者和护士的自我效能感进行了研究,但在特定的授权互动之后,员工内部健康控制信念的变化尚未得到研究。米德尔塞克斯社区学院的精神科护理专业的学生参加了三种类型的实习经验中的一种:利用“授权”学习原则的精神科患者的心理教育实习,传统的精神科实习,或内科-外科实习。在临床安置前后对各组进行Achterberg和Lawlis健康归因测验。心理教育组在安置后表现出内在性的显著提高;其他组没有经历这种变化。具体来说,在参与了一次赋权的教育经历之后,护士们自己将更多的权力归于病人,而不是医生和其他卫生人员,也不是命运。这些护士认为病人更有力量,更有权力。将因果关系归因于“有权势的人”(如医生等)或仅仅归因于“偶然”(如“这是我的命运——这些事情发生了”)的量表,在整个测试过程中都是稳定的。讨论了对教育界和医学界的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信