[The problem of interactions in perioperative prophylaxis: reducing the risk or increasing the risk?].

W Lorenz, B Stinner, D Duda, I Celik, W Dick, M Rothmund
{"title":"[The problem of interactions in perioperative prophylaxis: reducing the risk or increasing the risk?].","authors":"W Lorenz,&nbsp;B Stinner,&nbsp;D Duda,&nbsp;I Celik,&nbsp;W Dick,&nbsp;M Rothmund","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Risk research and risk analysis have to be modeled as a fairly complex system including multivariate regression modeling for risk factors in etiology, Markov models in pathogenesis, and a construct of mechanistic and hermeneutic variables for clinical outcome analysis. The McPeek index is proposed as an example. Several prophylaxes for risk reduction in the perioperative period produce risk reduction as well as risk augmentation in different types of outcome. These unexpected findings were observed not only in clinical trials, but also in animal experiments and in isolated tissues. This demonstrates a basic problem of handling complexity in the real clinical setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":77239,"journal":{"name":"Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie. Supplement. Kongressband. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie. Kongress","volume":"115 ","pages":"647-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie. Supplement. Kongressband. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie. Kongress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Risk research and risk analysis have to be modeled as a fairly complex system including multivariate regression modeling for risk factors in etiology, Markov models in pathogenesis, and a construct of mechanistic and hermeneutic variables for clinical outcome analysis. The McPeek index is proposed as an example. Several prophylaxes for risk reduction in the perioperative period produce risk reduction as well as risk augmentation in different types of outcome. These unexpected findings were observed not only in clinical trials, but also in animal experiments and in isolated tissues. This demonstrates a basic problem of handling complexity in the real clinical setting.

围手术期预防的相互作用问题:降低风险还是增加风险?
风险研究和风险分析必须作为一个相当复杂的系统建模,包括病因学中风险因素的多元回归模型,发病机制中的马尔可夫模型,以及临床结果分析的机制和解释学变量的构建。以McPeek指数为例。围手术期降低风险的几种预防措施在不同类型的结果中产生风险降低和风险增加的效果。这些意想不到的发现不仅在临床试验中,而且在动物实验和分离组织中也得到了观察。这显示了在实际临床环境中处理复杂性的一个基本问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信