[Sensitivity differences of different emulsion numbers for different UV/blue-sensitive films].

Aktuelle Radiologie Pub Date : 1998-11-01
C Blendl, K Goergens
{"title":"[Sensitivity differences of different emulsion numbers for different UV/blue-sensitive films].","authors":"C Blendl,&nbsp;K Goergens","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The German standard series DIN 6868 does not include a separate requirement for deviations in the sensitivity of different emulsion numbers or, respectively, the relative contribution of the film to sensitivity S of a screen film system (SFS) whose sensitivity is determined according to DIN 6867-1 [1]. The inclusion and interpretation of these contributions in the test body exposure according to DIN 6868-3 [2] has not proved to be of value since an unambiguous error recognition is only possible with considerable experimental experience (additional exposure of a sensitometer strip and interpretation of the resulting consequences). The investigations reported here demonstrate that the correlation of sensitometric parameters obtained from sensitometer strips generated with sensiometer exposure and X-ray exposure is so large that differences in sensitivity of different emulsion numbers of a screenfilm larger than delta log H > or = 0.015 or delta H > or = 4% can be surely detected on exact observance of the experimental limiting conditions. Thus, the statements by the manufacturers in \"ZVEI information Nr. 7 of the X-ray Regulation\" [3] with regard to the claimed scattering width of screenfilms can be tested and evaluated at least tendencially when the systemic fluctuations and measurement uncertainties, see in particular DIN 6868-55 Appendix E of Sept. 1996 (4), are correctly taken into consideration. In general a deviation in the sensitivity exceeding the manufacturers claimed maximal scattering range of delta log H = 0.06, i.e. delta H = 15% can be detected with certainty.</p>","PeriodicalId":76986,"journal":{"name":"Aktuelle Radiologie","volume":"8 6","pages":"288-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aktuelle Radiologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The German standard series DIN 6868 does not include a separate requirement for deviations in the sensitivity of different emulsion numbers or, respectively, the relative contribution of the film to sensitivity S of a screen film system (SFS) whose sensitivity is determined according to DIN 6867-1 [1]. The inclusion and interpretation of these contributions in the test body exposure according to DIN 6868-3 [2] has not proved to be of value since an unambiguous error recognition is only possible with considerable experimental experience (additional exposure of a sensitometer strip and interpretation of the resulting consequences). The investigations reported here demonstrate that the correlation of sensitometric parameters obtained from sensitometer strips generated with sensiometer exposure and X-ray exposure is so large that differences in sensitivity of different emulsion numbers of a screenfilm larger than delta log H > or = 0.015 or delta H > or = 4% can be surely detected on exact observance of the experimental limiting conditions. Thus, the statements by the manufacturers in "ZVEI information Nr. 7 of the X-ray Regulation" [3] with regard to the claimed scattering width of screenfilms can be tested and evaluated at least tendencially when the systemic fluctuations and measurement uncertainties, see in particular DIN 6868-55 Appendix E of Sept. 1996 (4), are correctly taken into consideration. In general a deviation in the sensitivity exceeding the manufacturers claimed maximal scattering range of delta log H = 0.06, i.e. delta H = 15% can be detected with certainty.

【不同乳剂数对不同UV/蓝感光膜的感光度差异】。
德国标准系列DIN 6868没有单独要求不同乳剂编号的灵敏度偏差,也没有单独要求膜对根据DIN 6867-1[1]确定灵敏度的屏膜系统(SFS)的灵敏度S的相对贡献。根据DIN 6868-3[2],在测试体暴露中包含和解释这些贡献并没有被证明是有价值的,因为明确的错误识别只有在有相当的实验经验的情况下才有可能(额外暴露灵敏度计条和解释结果)。本文报道的研究表明,从感光计曝光和x射线曝光生成的感光计条中获得的感光参数的相关性非常大,以至于在严格遵守实验极限条件的情况下,可以确定地检测出大于delta log H > or = 0.015或delta H > or = 4%的不同乳剂数量的屏幕膜的灵敏度差异。因此,当系统波动和测量不确定度(特别是参见1996年9月的DIN 6868-55附录E)被正确考虑时,制造商在“x射线法规ZVEI信息第7号”[3]中关于屏幕薄膜所声称的散射宽度的陈述至少可以被测试和评估。一般来说,灵敏度偏差超过制造商声称的最大散射范围delta log H = 0.06,即delta H = 15%,可以确定地检测到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信