[Value of MRI, CT and findings in staging of gynecologic malignancies].

Aktuelle Radiologie Pub Date : 1998-11-01
M Lorenzen, J Braun, A Gehrckens, V Nicolas
{"title":"[Value of MRI, CT and findings in staging of gynecologic malignancies].","authors":"M Lorenzen,&nbsp;J Braun,&nbsp;A Gehrckens,&nbsp;V Nicolas","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The present study was designed to compare the value of MRI, CT and clinical examination in local tumor staging of gynaecologic malignancies.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>99 patients with clinically suspected carcinoma of the cervix uteri, ovarian carcinoma or tumor recurrence after gynaecologic cancer underwent all three staging modalities. Furthermore CT and MRI were compared in detecting lymph node metastasis and peritoneal implants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MRI was superior to CT and clinical staging in local tumor staging with an accuracy of 77% for cervical carcinoma and of 88% for recurrent tumors, whereas CT achieved an accuracy of 65% and 55% and clinical staging 60% and 63% accuracy for carcinoma of the cervix and recurrent cancer. Especially for local staging of these two tumor entities MRI is very useful. MRI and CT reached comparable results in the detection of ovarian tumors with an accuracy of 73% for MRI and 69% for CI. Both imaging modalities also showed equal results in the detection of lymph node metastasis, so that primary the cost saving use of CT tumor staging for ovarian lesions and lymph node metastasis should be favoured.</p>","PeriodicalId":76986,"journal":{"name":"Aktuelle Radiologie","volume":"8 6","pages":"266-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aktuelle Radiologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The present study was designed to compare the value of MRI, CT and clinical examination in local tumor staging of gynaecologic malignancies.

Patients and methods: 99 patients with clinically suspected carcinoma of the cervix uteri, ovarian carcinoma or tumor recurrence after gynaecologic cancer underwent all three staging modalities. Furthermore CT and MRI were compared in detecting lymph node metastasis and peritoneal implants.

Results: MRI was superior to CT and clinical staging in local tumor staging with an accuracy of 77% for cervical carcinoma and of 88% for recurrent tumors, whereas CT achieved an accuracy of 65% and 55% and clinical staging 60% and 63% accuracy for carcinoma of the cervix and recurrent cancer. Especially for local staging of these two tumor entities MRI is very useful. MRI and CT reached comparable results in the detection of ovarian tumors with an accuracy of 73% for MRI and 69% for CI. Both imaging modalities also showed equal results in the detection of lymph node metastasis, so that primary the cost saving use of CT tumor staging for ovarian lesions and lymph node metastasis should be favoured.

[MRI、CT及其表现在妇科恶性肿瘤分期中的价值]。
目的:比较MRI、CT及临床检查在妇科恶性肿瘤局部分期中的价值。患者与方法:对99例临床怀疑为宫颈癌、卵巢癌或妇科癌后肿瘤复发的患者进行三种分期。并比较CT与MRI对淋巴结转移及腹膜植入物的检测效果。结果:MRI在局部肿瘤分期上优于CT和临床分期,宫颈癌的准确率为77%,复发肿瘤的准确率为88%,而宫颈癌和复发肿瘤的CT准确率分别为65%和55%,临床分期的准确率分别为60%和63%。特别是对于这两种肿瘤实体的局部分期,MRI非常有用。MRI和CT对卵巢肿瘤的检测结果相当,MRI的准确率为73%,CI的准确率为69%。两种成像方式在检测淋巴结转移方面也显示出相同的结果,因此,首先应该提倡使用CT肿瘤分期来检测卵巢病变和淋巴结转移,从而节省成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信