M Gartenschläger, F Schweden, C Düber, L S Weilemann, S Ott, T Westermeier, M Thelen
{"title":"[Clinical relevance of thoracic CT in intensive care and emergency medicine].","authors":"M Gartenschläger, F Schweden, C Düber, L S Weilemann, S Ott, T Westermeier, M Thelen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Evaluation of the impact, indications, and therapeutic efficiency of chest CT in intensive-care and emergency patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Retrospective assessment of 741 consecutive chest CT, or which 74% were acquired in the spiral technique, in intensive-care and emergency patients. Chest CT scans and respective clinical data were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>16% of all examinations were indicated to resolve questions arising from the chest radiogram, 10% to confirm or exclude pulmonary embolisms and 10% to confirm or exclude aortic dissection. In 10% a focus of infection was sought. 57% of all CT examinations had an impact on therapy, in 7% further diagnostic tests were prompted. Among a total of 588 clinical decisions based upon chest CT, the most frequent therapeutic conclusions consisted in: minimally invasive CT guided interventions in 17%. A new drug was administered in 13%, surgical intervention was performed in 13%, bed-side interventions such as insertion of a drainage tube in 13%, and a given pharmacological therapy was continued in 11%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Chest CT has a strong impact on patient management in emergency and critical-care medicine. CT guided interventions are frequently used in critically-ill patients. The introduction of the spiral technique has led to important new CT indications in the field of non-invasive vascular diagnosis, namely the assessment of pulmonary embolism and aortic dissection.</p>","PeriodicalId":76986,"journal":{"name":"Aktuelle Radiologie","volume":"8 6","pages":"260-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aktuelle Radiologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Evaluation of the impact, indications, and therapeutic efficiency of chest CT in intensive-care and emergency patients.
Materials and methods: Retrospective assessment of 741 consecutive chest CT, or which 74% were acquired in the spiral technique, in intensive-care and emergency patients. Chest CT scans and respective clinical data were compared.
Results: 16% of all examinations were indicated to resolve questions arising from the chest radiogram, 10% to confirm or exclude pulmonary embolisms and 10% to confirm or exclude aortic dissection. In 10% a focus of infection was sought. 57% of all CT examinations had an impact on therapy, in 7% further diagnostic tests were prompted. Among a total of 588 clinical decisions based upon chest CT, the most frequent therapeutic conclusions consisted in: minimally invasive CT guided interventions in 17%. A new drug was administered in 13%, surgical intervention was performed in 13%, bed-side interventions such as insertion of a drainage tube in 13%, and a given pharmacological therapy was continued in 11%.
Conclusion: Chest CT has a strong impact on patient management in emergency and critical-care medicine. CT guided interventions are frequently used in critically-ill patients. The introduction of the spiral technique has led to important new CT indications in the field of non-invasive vascular diagnosis, namely the assessment of pulmonary embolism and aortic dissection.