Influence of spontaneous activity on peak-ratio analysis

J Finsterer
{"title":"Influence of spontaneous activity on peak-ratio analysis","authors":"J Finsterer","doi":"10.1016/S0013-4694(98)00066-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Objectives</strong>: To prove or disprove the assumption that in neuropathy patients with abundant spontaneous activity, peak-ratio interference pattern analysis may lead to false negative results.<strong>Methods</strong>: Spontaneous activity &gt;100 <em>μ</em>V, automatically analysed by turn/amplitude analysis and expressed as (turns/second)/2 ((T/S)/2), and interference patterns, analysed by the peak-ratio technique, were recorded, one after the other, from the right anterior tibial muscle of 21 patients with neuropathy, aged 36–87 years.<strong>Results</strong>: The mean number of spontaneous discharges ((T/S)/2) was 12.3 (range 5.5–26) and its mean amplitude 261 <em>μ</em>V (range 146–478 <em>μ</em>V). Despite this abundant spontaneous activity, peak-ratio analysis was neurogenic in 81% of the patients. All peak-ratio parameters were independent on the amount and amplitude of spontaneous discharges.<strong>Conclusions</strong>: Spontaneous discharges &gt;100 <em>μ</em>V could be adequately assessed by means of the turn/amplitude analysis and did not influence peak-ratio analysis in neuropathies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72888,"journal":{"name":"Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology","volume":"107 4","pages":"Pages 254-257"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0013-4694(98)00066-2","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013469498000662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Objectives: To prove or disprove the assumption that in neuropathy patients with abundant spontaneous activity, peak-ratio interference pattern analysis may lead to false negative results.Methods: Spontaneous activity >100 μV, automatically analysed by turn/amplitude analysis and expressed as (turns/second)/2 ((T/S)/2), and interference patterns, analysed by the peak-ratio technique, were recorded, one after the other, from the right anterior tibial muscle of 21 patients with neuropathy, aged 36–87 years.Results: The mean number of spontaneous discharges ((T/S)/2) was 12.3 (range 5.5–26) and its mean amplitude 261 μV (range 146–478 μV). Despite this abundant spontaneous activity, peak-ratio analysis was neurogenic in 81% of the patients. All peak-ratio parameters were independent on the amount and amplitude of spontaneous discharges.Conclusions: Spontaneous discharges >100 μV could be adequately assessed by means of the turn/amplitude analysis and did not influence peak-ratio analysis in neuropathies.

自发活性对峰比分析的影响
目的:证明或反驳在自发性活动丰富的神经病变患者中,峰比干扰模式分析可能导致假阴性结果的假设。方法:记录21例36 ~ 87岁神经病变患者右胫前肌自发活动>100 μV,以(转数/秒)/2 ((T/S)/2)自动分析,并采用峰比法分析干扰模式。结果:平均自发放电次数(T/S)/2为12.3次(范围5.5 ~ 26次),平均放电幅度261 μV(范围146 ~ 478 μV)。尽管有大量的自发活动,81%的患者的峰比分析是神经源性的。所有峰比参数与自发放电的量和幅度无关。结论:自发放电>100 μV可以充分评估,且不影响神经病变的峰比分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信