Stretched minimal diameter of the ductus and coil occlusion.

H Tomita, S Fuse, S Chiba
{"title":"Stretched minimal diameter of the ductus and coil occlusion.","authors":"H Tomita,&nbsp;S Fuse,&nbsp;S Chiba","doi":"10.1111/j.1442-200x.1998.tb01967.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stretching of the ductus was supposed to determine the size mismatch of the coil with the ductus in coil occlusion that results in residual leak or migration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We measured the minimal diameter (D) and the stretched minimal diameter (S) of the ductus in 12 patients with patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). The stretch index (SI) was calculated as S divided by D. We calculated ratios of the loop diameter of the first implanted coil to D (C1/D) and S (C1/S) and those of the sum of all the loop diameters of all implanted coils for complete closure to D (total C/D) and to S (total C/S).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stretched minimal diameter divided by D was 1.8 +/- 0.3. Ratios of the loop diameter of the first implanted coil to D (C1/D), and S (C1/S) were 3.7 +/- 1.8 and 2.1 +/- 0.9, respectively. Ratios of the sum of all the loop diameters of all coils to D (total C/D) and S (total C/S) were 5.2 +/- 1.6 and 2.9 +/- 0.9, respectively. Standard deviations of C1/S and total C/S are significantly smaller than those of C1/D and total C/D, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The narrowest segment of the ductus could be stretched to twice the size of the minimal diameter. The stretched minimal diameter may be a more reliable parameter to select the loop diameter of coils than the angiographic minimal diameter.</p>","PeriodicalId":76975,"journal":{"name":"Acta paediatrica Japonica : Overseas edition","volume":"40 5","pages":"453-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1442-200x.1998.tb01967.x","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta paediatrica Japonica : Overseas edition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-200x.1998.tb01967.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Stretching of the ductus was supposed to determine the size mismatch of the coil with the ductus in coil occlusion that results in residual leak or migration.

Methods: We measured the minimal diameter (D) and the stretched minimal diameter (S) of the ductus in 12 patients with patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). The stretch index (SI) was calculated as S divided by D. We calculated ratios of the loop diameter of the first implanted coil to D (C1/D) and S (C1/S) and those of the sum of all the loop diameters of all implanted coils for complete closure to D (total C/D) and to S (total C/S).

Results: Stretched minimal diameter divided by D was 1.8 +/- 0.3. Ratios of the loop diameter of the first implanted coil to D (C1/D), and S (C1/S) were 3.7 +/- 1.8 and 2.1 +/- 0.9, respectively. Ratios of the sum of all the loop diameters of all coils to D (total C/D) and S (total C/S) were 5.2 +/- 1.6 and 2.9 +/- 0.9, respectively. Standard deviations of C1/S and total C/S are significantly smaller than those of C1/D and total C/D, respectively.

Conclusions: The narrowest segment of the ductus could be stretched to twice the size of the minimal diameter. The stretched minimal diameter may be a more reliable parameter to select the loop diameter of coils than the angiographic minimal diameter.

拉伸最小直径的导管和线圈闭塞。
背景:在线圈闭塞导致残留泄漏或迁移的情况下,导管的拉伸应该确定线圈与导管的尺寸不匹配。方法:对12例动脉导管未闭(PDA)患者进行导管最小直径(D)和拉伸最小直径(S)测量。拉伸指数(SI)计算为S /D。我们计算了第一个植入线圈的袢直径与D (C1/D)和S (C1/S)的比值,以及所有植入线圈完全闭合时袢直径与D(总C/D)和S(总C/S)的比值。结果:拉伸最小直径除以D为1.8 +/- 0.3。首次植入线圈袢直径与D (C1/D)和S (C1/S)之比分别为3.7 +/- 1.8和2.1 +/- 0.9。所有线圈的环路直径之和与D(总C/D)和S(总C/S)的比值分别为5.2 +/- 1.6和2.9 +/- 0.9。C1/S和总C/S的标准差显著小于C1/D和总C/D的标准差。结论:导管最窄段可拉伸至最小直径的2倍。与血管成像最小直径相比,拉伸最小直径可能是选择线圈袢直径更可靠的参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书