{"title":"Stretched minimal diameter of the ductus and coil occlusion.","authors":"H Tomita, S Fuse, S Chiba","doi":"10.1111/j.1442-200x.1998.tb01967.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stretching of the ductus was supposed to determine the size mismatch of the coil with the ductus in coil occlusion that results in residual leak or migration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We measured the minimal diameter (D) and the stretched minimal diameter (S) of the ductus in 12 patients with patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). The stretch index (SI) was calculated as S divided by D. We calculated ratios of the loop diameter of the first implanted coil to D (C1/D) and S (C1/S) and those of the sum of all the loop diameters of all implanted coils for complete closure to D (total C/D) and to S (total C/S).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stretched minimal diameter divided by D was 1.8 +/- 0.3. Ratios of the loop diameter of the first implanted coil to D (C1/D), and S (C1/S) were 3.7 +/- 1.8 and 2.1 +/- 0.9, respectively. Ratios of the sum of all the loop diameters of all coils to D (total C/D) and S (total C/S) were 5.2 +/- 1.6 and 2.9 +/- 0.9, respectively. Standard deviations of C1/S and total C/S are significantly smaller than those of C1/D and total C/D, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The narrowest segment of the ductus could be stretched to twice the size of the minimal diameter. The stretched minimal diameter may be a more reliable parameter to select the loop diameter of coils than the angiographic minimal diameter.</p>","PeriodicalId":76975,"journal":{"name":"Acta paediatrica Japonica : Overseas edition","volume":"40 5","pages":"453-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1442-200x.1998.tb01967.x","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta paediatrica Japonica : Overseas edition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-200x.1998.tb01967.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Background: Stretching of the ductus was supposed to determine the size mismatch of the coil with the ductus in coil occlusion that results in residual leak or migration.
Methods: We measured the minimal diameter (D) and the stretched minimal diameter (S) of the ductus in 12 patients with patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). The stretch index (SI) was calculated as S divided by D. We calculated ratios of the loop diameter of the first implanted coil to D (C1/D) and S (C1/S) and those of the sum of all the loop diameters of all implanted coils for complete closure to D (total C/D) and to S (total C/S).
Results: Stretched minimal diameter divided by D was 1.8 +/- 0.3. Ratios of the loop diameter of the first implanted coil to D (C1/D), and S (C1/S) were 3.7 +/- 1.8 and 2.1 +/- 0.9, respectively. Ratios of the sum of all the loop diameters of all coils to D (total C/D) and S (total C/S) were 5.2 +/- 1.6 and 2.9 +/- 0.9, respectively. Standard deviations of C1/S and total C/S are significantly smaller than those of C1/D and total C/D, respectively.
Conclusions: The narrowest segment of the ductus could be stretched to twice the size of the minimal diameter. The stretched minimal diameter may be a more reliable parameter to select the loop diameter of coils than the angiographic minimal diameter.