[MRI in typical and atypical aortic dissection].

Aktuelle Radiologie Pub Date : 1998-07-01
W Kersjes, N Fouda, T Sommer, S Mohr-Kahaly, K Schunk, F Schweden, H Schild
{"title":"[MRI in typical and atypical aortic dissection].","authors":"W Kersjes,&nbsp;N Fouda,&nbsp;T Sommer,&nbsp;S Mohr-Kahaly,&nbsp;K Schunk,&nbsp;F Schweden,&nbsp;H Schild","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the value of MRI in typical and atypical aortic dissections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MRI investigations on 16 patients with aortic dissections were analysed retrospectively; for 8 patients CT investigations carried out at almost the same time were available for comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all cases the diagnosis of aortic dissection was possible from MRI and CT. If a dissection membrane and a double lumen were present these were detected in all patients by both methods. In three patients with atypical dissections, only an asymmetrical abnormal wall thickening as sole sign for the presence of an aortic dissection was seen. A differentiation between true and false lumen was possible in 16 of 17 MRI investigations and in 5 of 8 CT investigations on the basis of differing blood flow velocities or, respectively, the detection of a thrombus in the false lumen. The relationship of the dissection membrane to the large aortic branches as well as the determination of the branch vessel origin with regard to true or false lumen could be evaluated better with MRI than with CT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Thus MRI has a significant role in the diagnosis and follow-up of aortic dissections. The advantage in comparison to the alternative spiral CT technique is, in addition to the absence of radiation exposure, the better analysis of the extent of the dissection as a result of the multi-planar slice orientation (especially in the region of the aortic arch and the arch vessel origins) without the necessity to administer iodine-containing contrast media.</p>","PeriodicalId":76986,"journal":{"name":"Aktuelle Radiologie","volume":"8 4","pages":"183-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aktuelle Radiologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the value of MRI in typical and atypical aortic dissections.

Methods: MRI investigations on 16 patients with aortic dissections were analysed retrospectively; for 8 patients CT investigations carried out at almost the same time were available for comparison.

Results: In all cases the diagnosis of aortic dissection was possible from MRI and CT. If a dissection membrane and a double lumen were present these were detected in all patients by both methods. In three patients with atypical dissections, only an asymmetrical abnormal wall thickening as sole sign for the presence of an aortic dissection was seen. A differentiation between true and false lumen was possible in 16 of 17 MRI investigations and in 5 of 8 CT investigations on the basis of differing blood flow velocities or, respectively, the detection of a thrombus in the false lumen. The relationship of the dissection membrane to the large aortic branches as well as the determination of the branch vessel origin with regard to true or false lumen could be evaluated better with MRI than with CT.

Conclusions: Thus MRI has a significant role in the diagnosis and follow-up of aortic dissections. The advantage in comparison to the alternative spiral CT technique is, in addition to the absence of radiation exposure, the better analysis of the extent of the dissection as a result of the multi-planar slice orientation (especially in the region of the aortic arch and the arch vessel origins) without the necessity to administer iodine-containing contrast media.

[典型和非典型主动脉夹层的MRI]。
目的:探讨MRI对典型和非典型主动脉夹层的诊断价值。方法:回顾性分析16例主动脉夹层患者的MRI表现;8例患者几乎同时进行的CT检查可供比较。结果:所有病例均可通过MRI和CT诊断主动脉夹层。如果存在夹层膜和双腔,所有患者均可通过两种方法检测到。在3例非典型夹层患者中,只有不对称的异常壁增厚作为主动脉夹层存在的唯一标志。17次MRI检查中有16次和8次CT检查中有5次根据不同的血流速度或分别在假腔中检测到血栓,可以区分真腔和假腔。与CT相比,MRI能更好地评价主动脉夹层膜与主动脉大分支的关系,以及分支血管起源与真腔或假腔的关系。结论:MRI对主动脉夹层的诊断和随访具有重要意义。与其他螺旋CT技术相比,该技术的优点是,除了没有辐射暴露外,由于多平面切片定向(特别是主动脉弓和弓血管起源区域),无需使用含碘造影剂,可以更好地分析剥离程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信