S.D.G Finucane, T Rafeei, J Kues, R.L Lamb, T.P Mayhew
{"title":"Reproducibility of electromyographic recordings of submaximal concentric and eccentric muscle contractions in humans","authors":"S.D.G Finucane, T Rafeei, J Kues, R.L Lamb, T.P Mayhew","doi":"10.1016/S0924-980X(98)00020-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Objectives</strong><span>: to determine the intratester and intertester reliability of measures of electromyographic activity (EMG) of submaximal concentric and eccentric contractions and to compare the reliability of normalized and non-normalized measures of EMG. There were 10 subjects, of 22–33 years old.</span></p><p><strong>Methods</strong><span>: Subjects performed submaximal concentric and eccentric contractions at 60°/s, and maximal isometric contractions<span> (MIC) of their knee extensors. The target power of the submaximal contractions was 90%±10% of the subject's maximal concentric power. EMG was recorded via bipolar surface electrodes from 3 of the quadriceps femoris muscles. The rmsEMG for submaximal contractions that were within the target power range were determined. The rmsEMG for the submaximal contractions were normalized to the rmsEMG of the maximal isometric contractions. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC version 1.1) were calculated to determine intratester and intertester reliability.</span></span></p><p><strong>Results</strong>: For non-normalized rmsEMG, ICC values for intratester reliability ranged from 0.62 to 0.91 for concentric and from 0.84 to 0.97 for eccentric contractions. ICC values for intertester reliability ranged from 0.66 to 0.96 for concentric and 0.78 to 0.90 for eccentric contractions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions</strong>: Non-normalized rmsEMG of submaximal concentric and eccentric isokinetic contractions were found to be reliable. Normalization did not lead to consistently improved reliability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100400,"journal":{"name":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Electromyography and Motor Control","volume":"109 4","pages":"Pages 290-296"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0924-980X(98)00020-4","citationCount":"46","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Electromyography and Motor Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924980X98000204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46
Abstract
Objectives: to determine the intratester and intertester reliability of measures of electromyographic activity (EMG) of submaximal concentric and eccentric contractions and to compare the reliability of normalized and non-normalized measures of EMG. There were 10 subjects, of 22–33 years old.
Methods: Subjects performed submaximal concentric and eccentric contractions at 60°/s, and maximal isometric contractions (MIC) of their knee extensors. The target power of the submaximal contractions was 90%±10% of the subject's maximal concentric power. EMG was recorded via bipolar surface electrodes from 3 of the quadriceps femoris muscles. The rmsEMG for submaximal contractions that were within the target power range were determined. The rmsEMG for the submaximal contractions were normalized to the rmsEMG of the maximal isometric contractions. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC version 1.1) were calculated to determine intratester and intertester reliability.
Results: For non-normalized rmsEMG, ICC values for intratester reliability ranged from 0.62 to 0.91 for concentric and from 0.84 to 0.97 for eccentric contractions. ICC values for intertester reliability ranged from 0.66 to 0.96 for concentric and 0.78 to 0.90 for eccentric contractions.
Conclusions: Non-normalized rmsEMG of submaximal concentric and eccentric isokinetic contractions were found to be reliable. Normalization did not lead to consistently improved reliability.