Reproducibility of electromyographic recordings of submaximal concentric and eccentric muscle contractions in humans

S.D.G Finucane, T Rafeei, J Kues, R.L Lamb, T.P Mayhew
{"title":"Reproducibility of electromyographic recordings of submaximal concentric and eccentric muscle contractions in humans","authors":"S.D.G Finucane,&nbsp;T Rafeei,&nbsp;J Kues,&nbsp;R.L Lamb,&nbsp;T.P Mayhew","doi":"10.1016/S0924-980X(98)00020-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Objectives</strong><span>: to determine the intratester and intertester reliability of measures of electromyographic activity (EMG) of submaximal concentric and eccentric contractions and to compare the reliability of normalized and non-normalized measures of EMG. There were 10 subjects, of 22–33 years old.</span></p><p><strong>Methods</strong><span>: Subjects performed submaximal concentric and eccentric contractions at 60°/s, and maximal isometric contractions<span> (MIC) of their knee extensors. The target power of the submaximal contractions was 90%±10% of the subject's maximal concentric power. EMG was recorded via bipolar surface electrodes from 3 of the quadriceps femoris muscles. The rmsEMG for submaximal contractions that were within the target power range were determined. The rmsEMG for the submaximal contractions were normalized to the rmsEMG of the maximal isometric contractions. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC version 1.1) were calculated to determine intratester and intertester reliability.</span></span></p><p><strong>Results</strong>: For non-normalized rmsEMG, ICC values for intratester reliability ranged from 0.62 to 0.91 for concentric and from 0.84 to 0.97 for eccentric contractions. ICC values for intertester reliability ranged from 0.66 to 0.96 for concentric and 0.78 to 0.90 for eccentric contractions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions</strong>: Non-normalized rmsEMG of submaximal concentric and eccentric isokinetic contractions were found to be reliable. Normalization did not lead to consistently improved reliability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100400,"journal":{"name":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Electromyography and Motor Control","volume":"109 4","pages":"Pages 290-296"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0924-980X(98)00020-4","citationCount":"46","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Electromyography and Motor Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924980X98000204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

Abstract

Objectives: to determine the intratester and intertester reliability of measures of electromyographic activity (EMG) of submaximal concentric and eccentric contractions and to compare the reliability of normalized and non-normalized measures of EMG. There were 10 subjects, of 22–33 years old.

Methods: Subjects performed submaximal concentric and eccentric contractions at 60°/s, and maximal isometric contractions (MIC) of their knee extensors. The target power of the submaximal contractions was 90%±10% of the subject's maximal concentric power. EMG was recorded via bipolar surface electrodes from 3 of the quadriceps femoris muscles. The rmsEMG for submaximal contractions that were within the target power range were determined. The rmsEMG for the submaximal contractions were normalized to the rmsEMG of the maximal isometric contractions. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC version 1.1) were calculated to determine intratester and intertester reliability.

Results: For non-normalized rmsEMG, ICC values for intratester reliability ranged from 0.62 to 0.91 for concentric and from 0.84 to 0.97 for eccentric contractions. ICC values for intertester reliability ranged from 0.66 to 0.96 for concentric and 0.78 to 0.90 for eccentric contractions.

Conclusions: Non-normalized rmsEMG of submaximal concentric and eccentric isokinetic contractions were found to be reliable. Normalization did not lead to consistently improved reliability.

人类次极大同心肌和偏心肌收缩的肌电记录的再现性
目的:确定次最大心性收缩和偏心收缩肌电活动(EMG)测量值在测试者内和测试者间的信度,并比较EMG标准化和非标准化测量值的信度。研究对象10名,年龄22-33岁。方法:受试者以60°/s的速度进行次最大同心收缩和偏心收缩,以及膝关节伸肌的最大等距收缩(MIC)。次极大收缩的目标功率为受试者最大同心收缩功率的90%±10%。通过双极表面电极记录3块股四头肌的肌电图。测定了在目标功率范围内的次极大收缩时的rmsEMG。将次极大收缩的rmsEMG归一化为最大等距收缩的rmsEMG。计算类内相关系数(ICC 1.1版)以确定测试者内部和测试者之间的信度。结果:对于非标准化rmsEMG,同心收缩的ICC值在0.62到0.91之间,偏心收缩的ICC值在0.84到0.97之间。测者间信度的ICC值在同心收缩的0.66到0.96之间,在偏心收缩的0.78到0.90之间。结论:非归一化的同心性和偏心等速收缩的rmsEMG是可靠的。规范化并没有导致可靠性的持续提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信