Long-latency response to transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with hemifacial spasm

Atsuhiro Kojima , Takayuki Ohira , Moriichiro Takase , Takeshi Kawase
{"title":"Long-latency response to transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with hemifacial spasm","authors":"Atsuhiro Kojima ,&nbsp;Takayuki Ohira ,&nbsp;Moriichiro Takase ,&nbsp;Takeshi Kawase","doi":"10.1016/S0924-980X(98)00019-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Objective</em><span><span>: We studied the long-latency response of the orbicularis oris muscle elicited with transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with </span>hemifacial spasm (HFS) and evaluated the excitability of the facial nucleus. </span><em>Methods</em><span>: We compared the thresholds on both sides in 8 normal volunteers and 7 patients with hemifacial spasm. The thresholds were determined as the lowest intensity required to produce motor evoked potentials with an amplitude of at least 50 </span><em>μ</em><span>V in the orbicularis oris muscle. Average values were given as means±standard deviation. Wilcoxon's rank sum test was used for comparisons between the sides of normal subjects and of patients with HFS with respect to the threshold stimulus. </span><em>Results</em>: There was no significant difference between the thresholds on the two sides of the normal subjects (mean 1.88±5.30%, <em>P</em>&gt;0.05). In patients with HFS, there was a significant difference between the thresholds on the spasm side and the normal side (mean 20.7±13.0%, <em>P</em><span>&lt;0 05) In one patient studied after MVD, the difference between both sides disappeared. </span><em>Conclusion</em>: The difference between the thresholds in patients with HFS and the normalization in threshold after MVD suggested that the mechanism of HFS was hyperexcitability of the facial nucleus.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100400,"journal":{"name":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Electromyography and Motor Control","volume":"109 4","pages":"Pages 285-289"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0924-980X(98)00019-8","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Electromyography and Motor Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924980X98000198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Objective: We studied the long-latency response of the orbicularis oris muscle elicited with transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with hemifacial spasm (HFS) and evaluated the excitability of the facial nucleus. Methods: We compared the thresholds on both sides in 8 normal volunteers and 7 patients with hemifacial spasm. The thresholds were determined as the lowest intensity required to produce motor evoked potentials with an amplitude of at least 50 μV in the orbicularis oris muscle. Average values were given as means±standard deviation. Wilcoxon's rank sum test was used for comparisons between the sides of normal subjects and of patients with HFS with respect to the threshold stimulus. Results: There was no significant difference between the thresholds on the two sides of the normal subjects (mean 1.88±5.30%, P>0.05). In patients with HFS, there was a significant difference between the thresholds on the spasm side and the normal side (mean 20.7±13.0%, P<0 05) In one patient studied after MVD, the difference between both sides disappeared. Conclusion: The difference between the thresholds in patients with HFS and the normalization in threshold after MVD suggested that the mechanism of HFS was hyperexcitability of the facial nucleus.

面肌痉挛患者经颅磁刺激的长潜伏期反应
目的:研究经颅磁刺激半面肌痉挛患者口轮匝肌的长潜伏期反应,评价面神经核的兴奋性。方法:比较8例正常人和7例面肌痉挛患者的双侧阈值。阈值为在口轮匝肌中产生振幅至少为50 μV的运动诱发电位所需的最低强度。平均值以平均值±标准差给出。使用Wilcoxon秩和检验比较正常受试者和HFS患者侧对阈值刺激的影响。结果:正常受试者两侧阈值差异无统计学意义(平均1.88±5.30%,P>0.05)。HFS患者痉挛侧阈值与正常侧阈值差异有统计学意义(平均20.7±13.0%,P< 0.05)。有1例患者MVD后,两侧阈值差异消失。结论:HFS患者的阈值与MVD后阈值正常化的差异提示HFS的机制是面神经核的高兴奋性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信