Usefulness of latero-orbital electrodes in detecting interictal epileptiform activity – a study of 60 patients with complex partial seizures1

Antonio Gambardella, Franco Pucci, Emilio Le Piane, Demetrio Messina, Concetta Russo, Mario Zappia, R Luciano Oliveri, Aldo Quattrone, Umberto Aguglia
{"title":"Usefulness of latero-orbital electrodes in detecting interictal epileptiform activity – a study of 60 patients with complex partial seizures1","authors":"Antonio Gambardella,&nbsp;Franco Pucci,&nbsp;Emilio Le Piane,&nbsp;Demetrio Messina,&nbsp;Concetta Russo,&nbsp;Mario Zappia,&nbsp;R Luciano Oliveri,&nbsp;Aldo Quattrone,&nbsp;Umberto Aguglia","doi":"10.1016/S0013-4694(98)00049-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Objectives</strong>: The use of latero-orbital (Lo) electrodes is a routine practice in any EEG laboratory to evaluate eye motion, but there are no data about their usefulness in revealing interictal epileptiform abnormalities.</p><p><strong>Methods</strong>: In 60 consecutive patients (27 men, 33 women, mean age 36 8 years, range 17–72) with complex partial seizures, we prospectively evaluated the utility of Lo electrodes in comparison with anterior temporal (AT) electrodes, for the detection of interictal epileptiform discharges (SW).</p><p><strong>Results</strong>: No epileptiform abnormality was seen in 4/60 patients. Both AT and Lo electrodes were significantly superior to 10–20 electrodes for detection of both patients and foci. Indeed, the standard 10–20 system alone allowed the detection of only 39 independent epileptiform foci in 35/56 (63%) patients, while AT and Lo electrodes were necessary for detection of 23 epileptiform foci in the remaining 21/56 (37%) patients. Importantly, there was no statistically significant difference in detection between AT and Lo electrodes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions</strong>: Recordings from Lo electrodes are comparable to those from AT electrodes and are useful for localizing interictal temporal spiking activity. Lo electrodes may be substituted for basal electrodes in the day-to-day evaluation of patients with complex partial seizures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72888,"journal":{"name":"Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology","volume":"107 2","pages":"Pages 174-176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0013-4694(98)00049-2","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013469498000492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objectives: The use of latero-orbital (Lo) electrodes is a routine practice in any EEG laboratory to evaluate eye motion, but there are no data about their usefulness in revealing interictal epileptiform abnormalities.

Methods: In 60 consecutive patients (27 men, 33 women, mean age 36 8 years, range 17–72) with complex partial seizures, we prospectively evaluated the utility of Lo electrodes in comparison with anterior temporal (AT) electrodes, for the detection of interictal epileptiform discharges (SW).

Results: No epileptiform abnormality was seen in 4/60 patients. Both AT and Lo electrodes were significantly superior to 10–20 electrodes for detection of both patients and foci. Indeed, the standard 10–20 system alone allowed the detection of only 39 independent epileptiform foci in 35/56 (63%) patients, while AT and Lo electrodes were necessary for detection of 23 epileptiform foci in the remaining 21/56 (37%) patients. Importantly, there was no statistically significant difference in detection between AT and Lo electrodes.

Conclusions: Recordings from Lo electrodes are comparable to those from AT electrodes and are useful for localizing interictal temporal spiking activity. Lo electrodes may be substituted for basal electrodes in the day-to-day evaluation of patients with complex partial seizures.

后眼窝电极检测间期癫痫样活动的有效性——对60例复杂部分性癫痫患者的研究1
目的:使用后眶电极(Lo)是任何脑电图实验室评估眼动的常规做法,但没有数据表明其在揭示间期癫痫样异常方面的有用性。方法:在60例复杂部分性癫痫患者中(27例男性,33例女性,平均年龄36.8岁,范围17-72岁),我们前瞻性地评估了Lo电极与颞叶前部(AT)电极在检测间期癫痫样放电(SW)方面的应用价值。结果:4/60患者未见癫痫样异常。AT和Lo电极在检测患者和病灶方面均显著优于10-20电极。事实上,标准的10-20系统仅能在35/56(63%)患者中检测到39个独立的癫痫样病灶,而AT和Lo电极在其余21/56(37%)患者中检测到23个癫痫样病灶是必要的。重要的是,AT电极和Lo电极在检测上没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:Lo电极的记录与AT电极的记录相当,可用于定位颞间峰活动。在复杂部分性癫痫患者的日常评估中,低电极可以代替基础电极。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信