Event-related desynchronization and synchronization during an auditory lexical matching task

Mira Karrasch , Christina M. Krause , Matti Laine , A.Heikki Lang , Marko Lehto
{"title":"Event-related desynchronization and synchronization during an auditory lexical matching task","authors":"Mira Karrasch ,&nbsp;Christina M. Krause ,&nbsp;Matti Laine ,&nbsp;A.Heikki Lang ,&nbsp;Marko Lehto","doi":"10.1016/S0013-4694(98)00047-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Objectives</strong>: Event-related desynchronization (ERD) and synchronization (ERS) of the 8–10 and 10–12 Hz frequency bands of the background EEG were studied in 10 subjects performing an auditory lexical matching task.</p><p><strong>Methods</strong>: The stimuli were words and pseudowords presented sequentially in pairs. The subject was prompted to answer whether the two stimuli shared the same lexical status (words or pseudowords).</p><p><strong>Results</strong>: Regardless of lexicality, the presentation of the first stimulus elicited a significant late frontal ERD in both alpha frequency bands. When preceded by a pseudoword, the presentation of the second stimulus elicited a significant ERS at 200–400 ms and a significant, long-lasting and topographically-widespread ERD at 600–2200 ms in both frequency bands. When preceded by a word, the second stimulus did not elicit ERS in the initial time window, but a late ERD which was similar to the one observed in the previous condition. The complexity of ERD/ERS changes in the present task was revealed by significant interactions that time had with frequency band, stimulus type, stimulus order and lexicality of the preceding stimulus.</p><p><strong>Conclusions</strong>: The results suggest that ERD/ERS does not reflect primary auditory stimulus processing. Rather, the ERD/ERS observed in this experiment most probably reflected task difficulty and differences between lexical–semantic and phonological memory functions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72888,"journal":{"name":"Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology","volume":"107 2","pages":"Pages 112-121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0013-4694(98)00047-9","citationCount":"53","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013469498000479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53

Abstract

Objectives: Event-related desynchronization (ERD) and synchronization (ERS) of the 8–10 and 10–12 Hz frequency bands of the background EEG were studied in 10 subjects performing an auditory lexical matching task.

Methods: The stimuli were words and pseudowords presented sequentially in pairs. The subject was prompted to answer whether the two stimuli shared the same lexical status (words or pseudowords).

Results: Regardless of lexicality, the presentation of the first stimulus elicited a significant late frontal ERD in both alpha frequency bands. When preceded by a pseudoword, the presentation of the second stimulus elicited a significant ERS at 200–400 ms and a significant, long-lasting and topographically-widespread ERD at 600–2200 ms in both frequency bands. When preceded by a word, the second stimulus did not elicit ERS in the initial time window, but a late ERD which was similar to the one observed in the previous condition. The complexity of ERD/ERS changes in the present task was revealed by significant interactions that time had with frequency band, stimulus type, stimulus order and lexicality of the preceding stimulus.

Conclusions: The results suggest that ERD/ERS does not reflect primary auditory stimulus processing. Rather, the ERD/ERS observed in this experiment most probably reflected task difficulty and differences between lexical–semantic and phonological memory functions.

听觉词汇匹配任务中与事件相关的去同步和同步
目的:研究10名被试进行听觉词汇匹配任务时背景脑电图8-10和10 - 12 Hz频段的事件相关去同步(ERD)和同步(ERS)。方法:以单词和假词为刺激物,按顺序成对呈现。受试者被要求回答这两个刺激物是否具有相同的词汇状态(单词或假词)。结果:无论词汇是否丰富,第一刺激的呈现在两个α频带都引起了显著的晚额叶ERD。当出现假词时,第二刺激在200-400 ms时引起了显著的ERS,在600-2200 ms时引起了显著的、持久的、地形上广泛的ERD。当第二刺激物前面有一个单词时,在初始时间窗内不会诱发ERS,但会诱发与前一刺激物相似的后期ERD。当前任务ERD/ERS变化的复杂性体现在时间与前一个刺激的频带、刺激类型、刺激顺序和词性的显著交互作用上。结论:ERD/ERS不反映初级听觉刺激加工。相反,本实验中观察到的ERD/ERS很可能反映了任务难度以及词汇-语义和语音记忆功能之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信