Median mixed and sensory nerve conduction studies in carpal tunnel syndrome1

Stephen N Scelsa, Steven Herskovitz, Phyllis Bieri, Alan R Berger
{"title":"Median mixed and sensory nerve conduction studies in carpal tunnel syndrome1","authors":"Stephen N Scelsa,&nbsp;Steven Herskovitz,&nbsp;Phyllis Bieri,&nbsp;Alan R Berger","doi":"10.1016/S0924-980X(98)00018-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Objective</strong><span>: To assess the sensitivities and specificities of velocity differences between median mixed nerve conduction across the wrist (Medmxpw) and (I) median mixed nerve conduction in the forearm (Medmxf) and (II) palm to D2 sensory conduction (MedpD2). </span><strong>Design and Methods</strong><span><span><span>: We prospectively studied 67 limbs of patients with clinically definite carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Medmxf and Medmxpw were performed by stimulating the </span>median nerve at the elbow and palm respectively and recording at the proximal wrist crease. We also compared conventional median sensory (D2–wrist) and mixed (palm–wrist) tests in all patients. Thirty limbs of asymptomatic subjects served as normal controls and 21 limbs of subjects with other </span>neuropathies served as diseased controls; control data was collected prospectively. </span><strong>Results</strong>: The sensitivity of the MedpD2–Medmxpw difference (0.87) was significantly greater than that of the Medmxf–Medmxpw difference (0.61, <em>P</em>&lt;0.001). Both tests were similar and highly specific (0.98 and 0.96, respectively). <strong>Conclusions</strong>: The MedpD2–Medmxpw study is among the most sensitive and specific electrophysiologic tests for CTS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100400,"journal":{"name":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Electromyography and Motor Control","volume":"109 3","pages":"Pages 268-273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0924-980X(98)00018-6","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Electromyography and Motor Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924980X98000186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Objective: To assess the sensitivities and specificities of velocity differences between median mixed nerve conduction across the wrist (Medmxpw) and (I) median mixed nerve conduction in the forearm (Medmxf) and (II) palm to D2 sensory conduction (MedpD2). Design and Methods: We prospectively studied 67 limbs of patients with clinically definite carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Medmxf and Medmxpw were performed by stimulating the median nerve at the elbow and palm respectively and recording at the proximal wrist crease. We also compared conventional median sensory (D2–wrist) and mixed (palm–wrist) tests in all patients. Thirty limbs of asymptomatic subjects served as normal controls and 21 limbs of subjects with other neuropathies served as diseased controls; control data was collected prospectively. Results: The sensitivity of the MedpD2–Medmxpw difference (0.87) was significantly greater than that of the Medmxf–Medmxpw difference (0.61, P<0.001). Both tests were similar and highly specific (0.98 and 0.96, respectively). Conclusions: The MedpD2–Medmxpw study is among the most sensitive and specific electrophysiologic tests for CTS.

腕管综合征的正中混合神经和感觉神经传导研究1
目的:评价腕部正中混合神经传导(Medmxpw)与(I)前臂正中混合神经传导(Medmxf)和(II)手掌正中混合神经传导(MedpD2)速度差的敏感性和特异性。设计与方法:前瞻性研究67例临床明确腕管综合征(CTS)患者的肢体。Medmxf和Medmxpw分别通过刺激肘部和手掌正中神经,在腕近端皱褶处记录。我们还比较了所有患者的常规正中感觉(d2 -手腕)和混合(手掌-手腕)测试。无症状者30条肢体作为正常对照,其他神经病变者21条肢体作为病变对照;对照数据采用前瞻性收集。结果:MedpD2-Medmxpw差异的敏感性(0.87)显著高于Medmxf-Medmxpw差异的敏感性(0.61,P<0.001)。两项检测结果相似且具有高度特异性(分别为0.98和0.96)。结论:MedpD2-Medmxpw研究是CTS最敏感和特异的电生理测试之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信