Attribution as a function of agential distance in a causal chain.

Abstract

The hypothesis that causality and blame will be differently affected by agential distance within a two-step causal chain was tested. A hypothetical medical accident was presented to 360 female college students in India, who gave causality, blame, or punishment judgments about either the proximal agent or the distal agent. The study had a 2 (proximal vs. distal agent) x 2 (high vs. low extenuation) x 2 (mild vs. severe outcome) x 3 (casuality, blame, or punishment judgments) fully crossed, between-subjects factorial design, with 15 participants per cell. In support of the basic hypothesis, more blame and punishment were assigned to the distal agent than to the proximal agent, whereas agential distance did not affect causal attribution. Extenuation was effective on causality and blame judgments only when the outcome was mild, and there was no effect of extenuation on punishment judgments, irrespective of outcome severity.