[Surgical treatment of genito-urinary prolapse by abdominal approach with promotofixation and setting of an anterior subvesical prosthesis combined with retropubic colpopexia: anatomical and functional results in 104 patients].
R Villet, E Mandron, D Salet-Lizee, M van den Akker, P Gadonneix, M Zafiropulo
{"title":"[Surgical treatment of genito-urinary prolapse by abdominal approach with promotofixation and setting of an anterior subvesical prosthesis combined with retropubic colpopexia: anatomical and functional results in 104 patients].","authors":"R Villet, E Mandron, D Salet-Lizee, M van den Akker, P Gadonneix, M Zafiropulo","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A homogeneous series of 104 patients with genito-urinary prolapse or urinary incontinence is reported. Surgical treatment combined promotofixation with (n = 45) or without (n = 59) subtotal hysterectomy, retropubic colpopexia and in certain cases posterior colpoperineorraphia with myorraphia of the levator ani (n = 28). Anatomic results were excellent for bladder and uterine ptosis. Moderate results were obtained for rectoceles and procedures involving the posterior perineum. A rectovaginal prosthesis or complete repair of the rectovaginal wall appeared to be required to improve results for rectoceles. Urine function was good for urinary incontinence: 91% success. Results depended on the pressure of the uretral closure. A complete urodynamic work-up is required prior to surgery in case of sphincter failure. Poor results were also related to excessive posterior traction which can open the cervico-uretral angle. Treatment of genito-urinary prolapse with promotofixation in combination with retropubic colpopexia is a reliable reproducible technique which gives excellent long-term results if excessive promontory traction is avoided and if, in certain cases, the rectovaginal wall is repaired or a prosthesis implanted when maximum uretral closure pressure is weak.</p>","PeriodicalId":10182,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgie; memoires de l'Academie de chirurgie","volume":"122 5-6","pages":"353-8; discussion 358-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgie; memoires de l'Academie de chirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A homogeneous series of 104 patients with genito-urinary prolapse or urinary incontinence is reported. Surgical treatment combined promotofixation with (n = 45) or without (n = 59) subtotal hysterectomy, retropubic colpopexia and in certain cases posterior colpoperineorraphia with myorraphia of the levator ani (n = 28). Anatomic results were excellent for bladder and uterine ptosis. Moderate results were obtained for rectoceles and procedures involving the posterior perineum. A rectovaginal prosthesis or complete repair of the rectovaginal wall appeared to be required to improve results for rectoceles. Urine function was good for urinary incontinence: 91% success. Results depended on the pressure of the uretral closure. A complete urodynamic work-up is required prior to surgery in case of sphincter failure. Poor results were also related to excessive posterior traction which can open the cervico-uretral angle. Treatment of genito-urinary prolapse with promotofixation in combination with retropubic colpopexia is a reliable reproducible technique which gives excellent long-term results if excessive promontory traction is avoided and if, in certain cases, the rectovaginal wall is repaired or a prosthesis implanted when maximum uretral closure pressure is weak.