EMG responses in the soleus muscles evoked by unipolar galvanic vestibular stimulation

S.R.D Watson, J.G Colebatch
{"title":"EMG responses in the soleus muscles evoked by unipolar galvanic vestibular stimulation","authors":"S.R.D Watson,&nbsp;J.G Colebatch","doi":"10.1016/S0924-980X(97)00044-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>This study compared the effects of transmastoid galvanic stimulation with unilateral galvanic stimulation of vestibular afferents. We recorded the effects on soleus EMG occurring at short (SL) and medium (ML) latency, both in normal subjects and in patients with previous unilateral vestibular neurectomy. Unipolar cathodal and anodal stimulation on the same side produced opposite effects for both SL and ML responses. Responses to unilateral cathodal or anodal stimulation were smaller, but otherwise resembled those of transmastoid stimulation with the cathode or the anode placed on the same side, respectively. Unilateral cathodal stimulation resulted in a larger SL response, which occurred at shorter latency than unilateral anodal stimulation. With unipolar stimulation on the side of previous </span>vestibular nerve section, typical SL and ML responses were absent. With stimulation of the intact side, the patients showed smaller SL responses than normal subjects with unilateral stimulation. The larger responses to unilateral cathodal compared to unilateral anodal stimulation are consistent with previous reports that cathodal stimulation produces an increase and anodal a decrease in vestibular nerve firing. The smaller SL responses in the patients may be a consequence of central nervous system reorganization following unilateral vestibular nerve section.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100400,"journal":{"name":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Electromyography and Motor Control","volume":"105 6","pages":"Pages 476-483"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0924-980X(97)00044-1","citationCount":"67","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Electromyography and Motor Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924980X97000441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 67

Abstract

This study compared the effects of transmastoid galvanic stimulation with unilateral galvanic stimulation of vestibular afferents. We recorded the effects on soleus EMG occurring at short (SL) and medium (ML) latency, both in normal subjects and in patients with previous unilateral vestibular neurectomy. Unipolar cathodal and anodal stimulation on the same side produced opposite effects for both SL and ML responses. Responses to unilateral cathodal or anodal stimulation were smaller, but otherwise resembled those of transmastoid stimulation with the cathode or the anode placed on the same side, respectively. Unilateral cathodal stimulation resulted in a larger SL response, which occurred at shorter latency than unilateral anodal stimulation. With unipolar stimulation on the side of previous vestibular nerve section, typical SL and ML responses were absent. With stimulation of the intact side, the patients showed smaller SL responses than normal subjects with unilateral stimulation. The larger responses to unilateral cathodal compared to unilateral anodal stimulation are consistent with previous reports that cathodal stimulation produces an increase and anodal a decrease in vestibular nerve firing. The smaller SL responses in the patients may be a consequence of central nervous system reorganization following unilateral vestibular nerve section.

单极前庭电刺激引起的比目鱼肌肌电反应
本研究比较了经乳突肌电刺激与单侧前庭传入神经电刺激的效果。我们记录了正常受试者和既往单侧前庭神经切除术患者在短潜伏期(SL)和中潜伏期(ML)时对比目鱼肌电图的影响。同侧的单极性阴极和单极性阳极刺激对SL和ML的反应产生相反的影响。对单侧阴极或阳极刺激的反应较小,但在其他方面类似于分别将阴极或阳极置于同侧的经乳突刺激。与单侧阳极刺激相比,单侧阴极刺激导致的SL反应更大,潜伏期更短。先前前庭神经切片单极刺激一侧,典型的左、中、左反应消失。在单侧刺激时,患者表现出比正常受试者更小的SL反应。与单侧阳极刺激相比,单侧阴极刺激的反应更大,这与先前的报道一致,即阴极刺激会增加前庭神经放电,而阳极刺激会减少前庭神经放电。患者的SL反应较小可能是单侧前庭神经切除后中枢神经系统重组的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信