Rapid rate transcranial magnetic stimulation – a safety study

Marjan Jahanshahi , Michael C Ridding , Patricia Limousin , Paolo Profice , Wolfgang Fogel , Dirk Dressler , Rebecca Fuller , Richard G Brown , Peter Brown , John C Rothwell
{"title":"Rapid rate transcranial magnetic stimulation – a safety study","authors":"Marjan Jahanshahi ,&nbsp;Michael C Ridding ,&nbsp;Patricia Limousin ,&nbsp;Paolo Profice ,&nbsp;Wolfgang Fogel ,&nbsp;Dirk Dressler ,&nbsp;Rebecca Fuller ,&nbsp;Richard G Brown ,&nbsp;Peter Brown ,&nbsp;John C Rothwell","doi":"10.1016/S0924-980X(97)00057-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>We assessed the safety of repeated short trains (4 stimuli) of rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation (rrTMS) over the left motor cortex in 6 healthy normal subjects. rrTMS involved two separate blocks of 50 consecutive trains of 4 stimuli at a frequency of 20 Hz and an intensity of 5–10% above active motor threshold. We monitored EEG, and assessed aspects of neurological (balance, gait, two-point discrimination, blood pressure, pulse rate), cognitive (attention, memory, executive function) and motor function (speed of movement initiation and execution and manual dexterity) before and after the two blocks of rrTMS. EMG was also recorded from a number of hand, forearm and arm muscles contralateral<span> to the site of stimulation. Two blocks of repeated rrTMS at 20 Hz and 5–10% above active motor threshold did not produce any adverse effects. Measures of neurological, cognitive and motor function showed no change following rrTMS. From the EMG recording there was evidence of increase in the amplitude of the motor evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded from the biceps in one subject during the first block of rrTMS, but this did not occur in the second block. A similar magnification of MEPs was also observed in another subject only during the second block of stimulation. When applied using parameters falling within published guidelines (</span></span><span>Pascual-Leone et al., 1993</span>; <span>Pascual-Leone et al., 1994</span>), repeated rrTMS is a relatively safe technique in healthy normal subjects. As rrTMS allows disruption of cortical function for a longer period, it has the potential of becoming a particularly useful tool for the study of cognitive function as well as sensory or motor function.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100400,"journal":{"name":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Electromyography and Motor Control","volume":"105 6","pages":"Pages 422-429"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0924-980X(97)00057-X","citationCount":"64","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Electromyography and Motor Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924980X9700057X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 64

Abstract

We assessed the safety of repeated short trains (4 stimuli) of rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation (rrTMS) over the left motor cortex in 6 healthy normal subjects. rrTMS involved two separate blocks of 50 consecutive trains of 4 stimuli at a frequency of 20 Hz and an intensity of 5–10% above active motor threshold. We monitored EEG, and assessed aspects of neurological (balance, gait, two-point discrimination, blood pressure, pulse rate), cognitive (attention, memory, executive function) and motor function (speed of movement initiation and execution and manual dexterity) before and after the two blocks of rrTMS. EMG was also recorded from a number of hand, forearm and arm muscles contralateral to the site of stimulation. Two blocks of repeated rrTMS at 20 Hz and 5–10% above active motor threshold did not produce any adverse effects. Measures of neurological, cognitive and motor function showed no change following rrTMS. From the EMG recording there was evidence of increase in the amplitude of the motor evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded from the biceps in one subject during the first block of rrTMS, but this did not occur in the second block. A similar magnification of MEPs was also observed in another subject only during the second block of stimulation. When applied using parameters falling within published guidelines (Pascual-Leone et al., 1993; Pascual-Leone et al., 1994), repeated rrTMS is a relatively safe technique in healthy normal subjects. As rrTMS allows disruption of cortical function for a longer period, it has the potential of becoming a particularly useful tool for the study of cognitive function as well as sensory or motor function.

快速经颅磁刺激-一项安全性研究
我们评估了6名健康正常人左运动皮质快速经颅磁刺激(rrTMS)重复短序列(4个刺激)的安全性。rrTMS包括50组连续的4组刺激,频率为20 Hz,强度高于主动运动阈值5-10%。我们监测了脑电图,并评估了两组rrTMS前后的神经学方面(平衡、步态、两点辨别、血压、脉搏率)、认知(注意力、记忆、执行功能)和运动功能(运动启动和执行的速度和手灵巧性)。也记录了刺激部位对侧的手、前臂和手臂肌肉的肌电图。在20 Hz和高于主动运动阈值5-10%的频率下重复两组rrTMS未产生任何不良反应。神经、认知和运动功能的测量显示rrTMS后没有变化。从肌电图记录来看,有证据表明,在rrTMS的第一个区块中,一名受试者的二头肌运动诱发电位(MEPs)的振幅增加,但在第二个区块中没有发生这种情况。在另一个实验对象中,MEPs也出现了类似的放大现象。当使用已公布的准则范围内的参数应用时(Pascual-Leone等人,1993;Pascual-Leone等,1994),在健康正常受试者中,重复rrTMS是一种相对安全的技术。由于rrTMS允许较长时间的皮层功能破坏,它有可能成为研究认知功能以及感觉或运动功能的特别有用的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信