[Development of a CT data-based score for prediction of fracture risk in osteoporosis].

Aktuelle Radiologie Pub Date : 1997-09-01
R Andresen, S Radmer, D Banzer
{"title":"[Development of a CT data-based score for prediction of fracture risk in osteoporosis].","authors":"R Andresen,&nbsp;S Radmer,&nbsp;D Banzer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It should be examined how far BMD semiquantitative (profile analysis) and qualitative datas (architecture of spongy bone, age of patient) can be combined in one score in order to improve the assessment of fracture risk. SE-QCT was performed in 220 patients with a mean age of 55.8 (33-84) years from whom conventional X-ray images of the thoracic and lumbar spine were available. In the axial scans spongiosa architecture was classified and a density profile analysis was carried out. This was followed by gradation of BMD values, different types of spongiosa architecture, profile analysis and age of patient to a numerical score. This was compared to the number of fractures, whereby the patients were separated into three groups: group I = no fracture, group II = one fracture, group III = more than one fracture. The BMD values, types of spongiosa architecture, semiquantitative profile analysis can be significantly assigned to the groups I and II (p < 0.02), groups I and III (p < 0.001), and the groups II and III (p < 0.05). By combining BMD values, architecture of spongy bone, density profile analysis, and age of patients without fracture, scale 8-12 = patients with or without fracture, scale 13-16 = patients with at least one fracture [corrected].</p>","PeriodicalId":76986,"journal":{"name":"Aktuelle Radiologie","volume":"7 5","pages":"264-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aktuelle Radiologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It should be examined how far BMD semiquantitative (profile analysis) and qualitative datas (architecture of spongy bone, age of patient) can be combined in one score in order to improve the assessment of fracture risk. SE-QCT was performed in 220 patients with a mean age of 55.8 (33-84) years from whom conventional X-ray images of the thoracic and lumbar spine were available. In the axial scans spongiosa architecture was classified and a density profile analysis was carried out. This was followed by gradation of BMD values, different types of spongiosa architecture, profile analysis and age of patient to a numerical score. This was compared to the number of fractures, whereby the patients were separated into three groups: group I = no fracture, group II = one fracture, group III = more than one fracture. The BMD values, types of spongiosa architecture, semiquantitative profile analysis can be significantly assigned to the groups I and II (p < 0.02), groups I and III (p < 0.001), and the groups II and III (p < 0.05). By combining BMD values, architecture of spongy bone, density profile analysis, and age of patients without fracture, scale 8-12 = patients with or without fracture, scale 13-16 = patients with at least one fracture [corrected].

[基于CT数据的骨质疏松症骨折风险预测评分的发展]。
为了提高骨折风险的评估,应该研究BMD半定量(剖面分析)和定性数据(海绵状骨结构、患者年龄)在多大程度上可以结合在一个评分中。对220例平均年龄为55.8(33-84)岁的患者进行SE-QCT检查,这些患者均有胸椎和腰椎的常规x线图像。轴向扫描对海绵状结构进行了分类,并进行了密度剖面分析。随后对骨密度值、不同类型的海绵膜结构、剖面分析和患者年龄进行分级,得出数值评分。将其与骨折数量进行比较,将患者分为三组:I组=无骨折,II组=一次骨折,III组=不止一次骨折。骨密度值、海绵体结构类型、半定量剖面分析在I和II组(p < 0.02)、I和III组(p < 0.001)、II和III组(p < 0.05)均有显著性差异。结合BMD值、海绵骨结构、密度剖面分析及无骨折患者年龄,量表8-12 =有或无骨折患者,量表13-16 =至少有一次骨折患者[校正]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信