Improving information management in family practice: testing an adult learning model.

S Teasdale, M Bainbridge
{"title":"Improving information management in family practice: testing an adult learning model.","authors":"S Teasdale,&nbsp;M Bainbridge","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Information management training has been neglected in family practice in the UK in the past. An adult learning model for such training is introduced. A pilot study using the adult learning approach showed improvements in information management processes over the six-month study period. The research project described in this paper compares the effectiveness of on-site training using adult learning methods, written information, and no intervention, in 33 family practices in the UK. Nine of the eleven practices in the on-site training group completed the training sessions and eight provided full data, whereas only one of the eleven practices in the written information group, and only one of the eleven practices in the control group provided full data. Preliminary analysis demonstrates that on-site training practices made considerable changes to the information systems in their practices, and appreciated the importance of high-quality data, both for patient care and reporting requirements. Full comparisons of data quality and information management methods are presented, and an assessment of priority training needs for maximum benefit is made.</p>","PeriodicalId":79455,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings : a conference of the American Medical Informatics Association. AMIA Fall Symposium","volume":" ","pages":"687-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2233466/pdf/procamiaafs00001-0721.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings : a conference of the American Medical Informatics Association. AMIA Fall Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Information management training has been neglected in family practice in the UK in the past. An adult learning model for such training is introduced. A pilot study using the adult learning approach showed improvements in information management processes over the six-month study period. The research project described in this paper compares the effectiveness of on-site training using adult learning methods, written information, and no intervention, in 33 family practices in the UK. Nine of the eleven practices in the on-site training group completed the training sessions and eight provided full data, whereas only one of the eleven practices in the written information group, and only one of the eleven practices in the control group provided full data. Preliminary analysis demonstrates that on-site training practices made considerable changes to the information systems in their practices, and appreciated the importance of high-quality data, both for patient care and reporting requirements. Full comparisons of data quality and information management methods are presented, and an assessment of priority training needs for maximum benefit is made.

改进家庭医疗信息管理:一种成人学习模式的检验。
信息管理培训在过去的英国家庭实践中一直被忽视。介绍了一种用于此类训练的成人学习模型。一项使用成人学习方法的试点研究表明,在六个月的研究期间,信息管理过程有所改善。本文描述的研究项目比较了英国33个家庭实践中使用成人学习方法、书面信息和不干预的现场培训的有效性。现场训练组的11个实践中有9个完成了培训课程,8个提供了完整的数据,而书面信息组的11个实践中只有一个提供了完整的数据,对照组的11个实践中只有一个提供了完整的数据。初步分析表明,现场培训实践对其实践中的信息系统做出了相当大的改变,并认识到高质量数据对患者护理和报告要求的重要性。提出了数据质量和信息管理方法的全面比较,并评估了最大效益的优先培训需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信