Desktop teleradiology in support of rural orthopedic trauma care.

J G Reid, J J McGowan, M A Ricci, G McFarlane
{"title":"Desktop teleradiology in support of rural orthopedic trauma care.","authors":"J G Reid,&nbsp;J J McGowan,&nbsp;M A Ricci,&nbsp;G McFarlane","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Research has shown that diagnostic quality images for most teleradiology applications requires a sophisticated telemedicine system and access to a large amount of bandwidth. While the ideal standards have been set by those involved in evaluating teleradiology, these standards are impractical for many small rural health centers which deliver routine trauma care. While there is no disagreement about the ultimate need for this level of teleradiology support, the purpose of this research was to determine whether Orthopedists would be able to read plain radiographs of orthopedic trauma injuries using a desktop teleradiology system in support of rural trauma care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Two radiology residents and two orthopedic residents viewed forty radiographs, twenty through a desktop teleradiology system and twenty in person. Diagnostic findings and certainty of diagnosis were recorded.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>There was no statistically significant difference between modalities in orthopedic residents' ability to correctly diagnose orthopedic trauma injuries. Further, for those instances when the diagnosis was imprecise, the residents were aware of their inability to make an accurate diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the study was relatively limited and further research needs to be done, the use of desktop teleradiology in support of rural orthopedic trauma consultation is a promising alternative to the more expensive forms of telemedicine technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":79455,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings : a conference of the American Medical Informatics Association. AMIA Fall Symposium","volume":" ","pages":"403-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2233474/pdf/procamiaafs00001-0440.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings : a conference of the American Medical Informatics Association. AMIA Fall Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unlabelled: Research has shown that diagnostic quality images for most teleradiology applications requires a sophisticated telemedicine system and access to a large amount of bandwidth. While the ideal standards have been set by those involved in evaluating teleradiology, these standards are impractical for many small rural health centers which deliver routine trauma care. While there is no disagreement about the ultimate need for this level of teleradiology support, the purpose of this research was to determine whether Orthopedists would be able to read plain radiographs of orthopedic trauma injuries using a desktop teleradiology system in support of rural trauma care.

Method: Two radiology residents and two orthopedic residents viewed forty radiographs, twenty through a desktop teleradiology system and twenty in person. Diagnostic findings and certainty of diagnosis were recorded.

Findings: There was no statistically significant difference between modalities in orthopedic residents' ability to correctly diagnose orthopedic trauma injuries. Further, for those instances when the diagnosis was imprecise, the residents were aware of their inability to make an accurate diagnosis.

Conclusion: Although the study was relatively limited and further research needs to be done, the use of desktop teleradiology in support of rural orthopedic trauma consultation is a promising alternative to the more expensive forms of telemedicine technology.

桌面远程放射学支持农村骨科创伤护理。
未标记:研究表明,大多数远程放射学应用的诊断质量图像需要复杂的远程医疗系统和大量带宽。虽然那些参与评估远程放射学的人制定了理想的标准,但这些标准对于许多提供常规创伤护理的小型农村卫生中心来说是不切实际的。虽然对于这种水平的远程放射支持的最终需求没有分歧,但本研究的目的是确定骨科医生是否能够使用桌面远程放射系统阅读骨科创伤损伤的x线平片,以支持农村创伤护理。方法:两名放射科住院医师和两名骨科住院医师观看了40张x线片,其中20张通过桌面远程放射系统观看,20张亲自观看。记录诊断结果和诊断的确定性。结果:在骨科住院医师正确诊断骨科创伤损伤的能力方面,两种治疗方式之间无统计学差异。此外,对于那些诊断不准确的情况,住院医生意识到他们无法做出准确的诊断。结论:虽然研究相对有限,需要进一步研究,但使用桌面远程放射学支持农村骨科创伤会诊是一种有希望的替代昂贵的远程医疗技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信