Capturing clinical reports in a large academic medical center: feeding a central patient data repository.

M K Ekstrom, H F Orthner, H R Warner
{"title":"Capturing clinical reports in a large academic medical center: feeding a central patient data repository.","authors":"M K Ekstrom,&nbsp;H F Orthner,&nbsp;H R Warner","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical reports, notes, and other narratives are highly used components in the patient record. Unfortunately, the methods by which these reports are generated are as diverse as the fiscal autonomy of academic clinical departments in a university-based health science center. In this paper, we report on electronically capturing clinical reports, notes, and other text fragments from several hospital sources and many outpatient clinics. The purpose of the capture is to feed the ACIS (Advanced Clinical Information System) central patient data repository that is in use at the University of Utah Health Sciences Center (UUHSC). A survey conducted in early 1994 indicated that about 917,150 reports were generated per year at UUHSC representing about 1.2 million pieces of paper, occupying about 2.3 gigabytes of storage. The most crucial problem encountered in capturing the reports was linking them to the proper patient. Systems that had functioning and well-maintained admit-discharge-transfer (ADT) information performed well, but systems that relied on the human dictator to identify patients, produced patient linkage errors. In our open loop telephone dictation systems this error rate averaged between 6 and 10%. Subsequent to the wide-spread availability of clinical reports on ACIS, this error rate dropped to 3-5%, presumably due to increased demand for on-line availability of this information. From clinical secretaries who use their word processor to create the clinical reports, the linkage error rate was < 1% due to the use of our Advanced Text Upload (ATU) utility. The clinical text component in ACIS contributed significantly to the success of a JCAHO site visit in December 1995.</p>","PeriodicalId":79455,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings : a conference of the American Medical Informatics Association. AMIA Fall Symposium","volume":" ","pages":"2-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2233442/pdf/procamiaafs00001-0041.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings : a conference of the American Medical Informatics Association. AMIA Fall Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical reports, notes, and other narratives are highly used components in the patient record. Unfortunately, the methods by which these reports are generated are as diverse as the fiscal autonomy of academic clinical departments in a university-based health science center. In this paper, we report on electronically capturing clinical reports, notes, and other text fragments from several hospital sources and many outpatient clinics. The purpose of the capture is to feed the ACIS (Advanced Clinical Information System) central patient data repository that is in use at the University of Utah Health Sciences Center (UUHSC). A survey conducted in early 1994 indicated that about 917,150 reports were generated per year at UUHSC representing about 1.2 million pieces of paper, occupying about 2.3 gigabytes of storage. The most crucial problem encountered in capturing the reports was linking them to the proper patient. Systems that had functioning and well-maintained admit-discharge-transfer (ADT) information performed well, but systems that relied on the human dictator to identify patients, produced patient linkage errors. In our open loop telephone dictation systems this error rate averaged between 6 and 10%. Subsequent to the wide-spread availability of clinical reports on ACIS, this error rate dropped to 3-5%, presumably due to increased demand for on-line availability of this information. From clinical secretaries who use their word processor to create the clinical reports, the linkage error rate was < 1% due to the use of our Advanced Text Upload (ATU) utility. The clinical text component in ACIS contributed significantly to the success of a JCAHO site visit in December 1995.

在大型学术医疗中心捕获临床报告:提供中央患者数据存储库。
临床报告、笔记和其他叙述是患者记录中高度使用的组成部分。不幸的是,产生这些报告的方法就像大学卫生科学中心的学术临床部门的财政自主权一样多种多样。在本文中,我们报告了电子捕获临床报告,笔记和其他文本片段,从几个医院来源和许多门诊诊所。捕获的目的是为犹他大学健康科学中心(uhsc)使用的ACIS(高级临床信息系统)中央患者数据存储库提供数据。1994年初进行的一项调查显示,联合卫生保健中心每年产生约917 150份报告,约120万张纸,占用约2.3千兆字节的存储空间。在获取报告时遇到的最关键的问题是将它们与合适的患者联系起来。具有功能和维护良好的入院-出院-转移(ADT)信息的系统表现良好,但依赖于人类独裁者识别患者的系统会产生患者链接错误。在我们的开环电话听写系统中,错误率平均在6%到10%之间。随着ACIS临床报告的广泛使用,这一错误率下降到3-5%,可能是由于对在线获取这些信息的需求增加。从使用文字处理程序创建临床报告的临床秘书来看,由于使用了我们的高级文本上传(ATU)实用程序,链接错误率< 1%。ACIS的临床文本部分对1995年12月联合卫生组织实地考察的成功作出了重大贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信