Epidemiology of foodborne diseases: a worldwide review.

E C Todd
{"title":"Epidemiology of foodborne diseases: a worldwide review.","authors":"E C Todd","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute foodborne disease infections and intoxications are much more of a concern to governments and the food industry today than a few decades ago. Some of the factors that have led to this include the identification of new agents that have caused life-threatening conditions; the finding that traditional agents are being associated with foods that were of no concern previously: an increasing number of large outbreaks being reported; the impact of foodborne disease on children, the aging population and the immunocompromised; migrant populations demanding their traditional foods in the countries of settlement; the ease of worldwide shipment of fresh and frozen food; and the development of new food industries, including aquaculture. However, to meaningfully monitor increases or decreases in foodborne disease requires an effective surveillance system at the local, national and international levels. To date, resources have been limited for most countries and regions to do this, and our current knowledge is based, for the most part, on passive reporting mechanisms. Laboratory isolation data and reports of notifiable diseases have some value in observing timely changes in case numbers of some enteric diseases, but they usually do not indicate the reasons for these trends. Special epidemiological studies are useful for the area covered, but it is often questionable whether they can be extrapolated to other areas or countries. Outbreak investigations tell us that a certain set of circumstances led to illness and that another outbreak may occur under similar but not necessarily identical conditions. Control programmes have often been triggered by the conclusions from investigations of specific outbreaks. Unfortunately, the agent/ food combination leading to illness in many of the reported incidents were not predicted from existing databases, and no doubt foodborne agents will continue to surprise food control agencies in the foreseeable future. Nevertheless, data from around the world do show some common elements. Salmonella is still the most important agent causing acute foodborne disease, with Salmonella enteritidis and S. typhimurium being of most concern. Foods of animal origin, particularly, meat and eggs, were most often implicated. Desserts, ice cream and confectionery items were products also mentioned, but some of these would have egg as a raw or incompletely cooked ingredient. Incidents most frequently occurred in homes or restaurants, and the main factors contributing to outbreaks were poor temperature control in preparing, cooking and storing food. Clostridium botulinum, Salmonella and VTEC are more frequently documented in industrialized than in developing countries. ETEC, EPEC, Shigella, Vibrio cholerae and parasites are the main scourges in developing countries, but it is uncertain how many cases are attributed to food, to water or to person-to-person transmission. The apparent decrease of S. aureus and C. perfringens outbreaks in industrialized countries may be related to improved temperature control in the kitchen. An increasing number of illnesses are international in scope, with contamination in a commercial product occurring in one country and affecting persons in several other countries, or tourists being infected abroad and possibly transmitting the pathogen to others at home. For Salmonella, a rapid alert and response coordination is being encouraged through Salm-Net and other international programs. However, unless such a network is worldwide, tracking clusters of illnesses is going to fall on the countries where the first cases occur, and some of these have very limited resources for investigation and control. It was heartening to see funds recently being allocated to foodborne disease surveillance and control in several industrialized countries, but the same commitment is required by the World Health Organization for the international community.</p>","PeriodicalId":76824,"journal":{"name":"World health statistics quarterly. Rapport trimestriel de statistiques sanitaires mondiales","volume":"50 1-2","pages":"30-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World health statistics quarterly. Rapport trimestriel de statistiques sanitaires mondiales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acute foodborne disease infections and intoxications are much more of a concern to governments and the food industry today than a few decades ago. Some of the factors that have led to this include the identification of new agents that have caused life-threatening conditions; the finding that traditional agents are being associated with foods that were of no concern previously: an increasing number of large outbreaks being reported; the impact of foodborne disease on children, the aging population and the immunocompromised; migrant populations demanding their traditional foods in the countries of settlement; the ease of worldwide shipment of fresh and frozen food; and the development of new food industries, including aquaculture. However, to meaningfully monitor increases or decreases in foodborne disease requires an effective surveillance system at the local, national and international levels. To date, resources have been limited for most countries and regions to do this, and our current knowledge is based, for the most part, on passive reporting mechanisms. Laboratory isolation data and reports of notifiable diseases have some value in observing timely changes in case numbers of some enteric diseases, but they usually do not indicate the reasons for these trends. Special epidemiological studies are useful for the area covered, but it is often questionable whether they can be extrapolated to other areas or countries. Outbreak investigations tell us that a certain set of circumstances led to illness and that another outbreak may occur under similar but not necessarily identical conditions. Control programmes have often been triggered by the conclusions from investigations of specific outbreaks. Unfortunately, the agent/ food combination leading to illness in many of the reported incidents were not predicted from existing databases, and no doubt foodborne agents will continue to surprise food control agencies in the foreseeable future. Nevertheless, data from around the world do show some common elements. Salmonella is still the most important agent causing acute foodborne disease, with Salmonella enteritidis and S. typhimurium being of most concern. Foods of animal origin, particularly, meat and eggs, were most often implicated. Desserts, ice cream and confectionery items were products also mentioned, but some of these would have egg as a raw or incompletely cooked ingredient. Incidents most frequently occurred in homes or restaurants, and the main factors contributing to outbreaks were poor temperature control in preparing, cooking and storing food. Clostridium botulinum, Salmonella and VTEC are more frequently documented in industrialized than in developing countries. ETEC, EPEC, Shigella, Vibrio cholerae and parasites are the main scourges in developing countries, but it is uncertain how many cases are attributed to food, to water or to person-to-person transmission. The apparent decrease of S. aureus and C. perfringens outbreaks in industrialized countries may be related to improved temperature control in the kitchen. An increasing number of illnesses are international in scope, with contamination in a commercial product occurring in one country and affecting persons in several other countries, or tourists being infected abroad and possibly transmitting the pathogen to others at home. For Salmonella, a rapid alert and response coordination is being encouraged through Salm-Net and other international programs. However, unless such a network is worldwide, tracking clusters of illnesses is going to fall on the countries where the first cases occur, and some of these have very limited resources for investigation and control. It was heartening to see funds recently being allocated to foodborne disease surveillance and control in several industrialized countries, but the same commitment is required by the World Health Organization for the international community.

食源性疾病流行病学:全球综述。
与几十年前相比,急性食源性疾病感染和中毒是当今政府和食品工业更加关注的问题。导致这种情况的一些因素包括:发现了导致危及生命的疾病的新药物;发现传统药剂与以前不受关注的食物有关:报告的大规模疫情越来越多;食源性疾病对儿童、老龄人口和免疫功能低下者的影响;移民人口在定居国要求他们的传统食物;世界范围内新鲜和冷冻食品运输的便利性;以及发展包括水产养殖在内的新型食品工业。然而,要有意义地监测食源性疾病的增减,需要在地方、国家和国际各级建立有效的监测系统。迄今为止,大多数国家和地区在这方面的资源有限,我们目前的知识在很大程度上是基于被动报告机制。实验室隔离数据和法定传染病报告在观察某些肠道疾病病例数的及时变化方面具有一定价值,但它们通常不能说明这些趋势的原因。特别流行病学研究对所涵盖的地区是有用的,但它们是否可以外推到其他地区或国家往往是值得怀疑的。疫情调查告诉我们,某种情况导致疾病,在类似但不一定完全相同的条件下可能发生另一次疫情。控制规划往往是根据对具体疫情的调查得出的结论而启动的。不幸的是,在许多报告的事件中,导致疾病的病原体/食物组合并没有从现有的数据库中预测出来,毫无疑问,在可预见的未来,食源性病原体将继续让食品控制机构感到惊讶。然而,来自世界各地的数据确实显示了一些共同的因素。沙门氏菌仍然是引起急性食源性疾病的最重要病原体,其中肠炎沙门氏菌和鼠伤寒沙门氏菌最受关注。动物源性食品,特别是肉和蛋,最常受到牵连。甜点、冰淇淋和糖果产品也被提及,但其中一些产品将鸡蛋作为生的或未完全煮熟的原料。事件最常发生在家庭或餐馆,造成疫情的主要因素是准备、烹饪和储存食物时温度控制不当。肉毒杆菌、沙门氏菌和VTEC在工业化国家比在发展中国家更常见。ETEC、EPEC、志贺氏菌、霍乱弧菌和寄生虫是发展中国家的主要祸害,但不确定有多少病例是由食物、水或人与人之间的传播引起的。在工业化国家,金黄色葡萄球菌和产气荚膜球菌疫情的明显减少可能与厨房温度控制的改善有关。越来越多的疾病具有国际范围,商业产品的污染发生在一个国家,影响到其他几个国家的人,或者游客在国外受到感染,并可能将病原体传染给国内的其他人。对于沙门氏菌,正在通过“Salm-Net”和其他国际项目鼓励快速警报和反应协调。然而,除非这样一个网络是全球性的,否则追踪疾病聚集性病例将落在出现首批病例的国家身上,其中一些国家用于调查和控制的资源非常有限。令人鼓舞的是,一些工业化国家最近为食源性疾病监测和控制拨付了资金,但世界卫生组织要求国际社会作出同样的承诺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信