Subjective responses to light sources of different colour temperatures and illuminances.

I Schröder
{"title":"Subjective responses to light sources of different colour temperatures and illuminances.","authors":"I Schröder","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>User attitudes towards certain lighting conditions have as yet been predominantly a field of lighting engineering research, aiming at an optimisation of lighting conditions on the basis of averages. Therefore, data on the interindividual variability of subjective responses hardly exist. In contrast to this, the methodological approach of industrial anthropology is based on the consideration of individual variation to provide basic data which are required to design our dwelling environment. Against this background we simulated an office work situation in the light laboratory and-using semantic differentials-studied subjective responses to four different lighting conditions in which different illuminance levels were combined with different colour temperatures of the light source. Colour temperature is an aspect of artificial illumination that has rarely been considered in lighting studies. The results of our study indicate that (1) subjective judgements of the four lighting situations differ significantly, (2) relatively long, repeated exposures of test participants to lighting situations lead to a change of attitudes, and (3) subjective judgements and preferences show a considerable interindividual variation. These results suggest that lighting designs of office rooms that are merely orientated towards averages are inadequate and support lighting concepts that allow for individually adjustable light sources.</p>","PeriodicalId":76854,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Morphologie und Anthropologie","volume":"81 2","pages":"235-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Morphologie und Anthropologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

User attitudes towards certain lighting conditions have as yet been predominantly a field of lighting engineering research, aiming at an optimisation of lighting conditions on the basis of averages. Therefore, data on the interindividual variability of subjective responses hardly exist. In contrast to this, the methodological approach of industrial anthropology is based on the consideration of individual variation to provide basic data which are required to design our dwelling environment. Against this background we simulated an office work situation in the light laboratory and-using semantic differentials-studied subjective responses to four different lighting conditions in which different illuminance levels were combined with different colour temperatures of the light source. Colour temperature is an aspect of artificial illumination that has rarely been considered in lighting studies. The results of our study indicate that (1) subjective judgements of the four lighting situations differ significantly, (2) relatively long, repeated exposures of test participants to lighting situations lead to a change of attitudes, and (3) subjective judgements and preferences show a considerable interindividual variation. These results suggest that lighting designs of office rooms that are merely orientated towards averages are inadequate and support lighting concepts that allow for individually adjustable light sources.

对不同色温和照度的光源的主观反应。
用户对某些照明条件的态度一直是照明工程研究的主要领域,其目的是在平均水平的基础上优化照明条件。因此,关于主观反应的个体间变异性的数据几乎不存在。与此相反,工业人类学的方法论方法是基于对个体差异的考虑,为设计我们的居住环境提供所需的基本数据。在此背景下,我们在灯光实验室模拟了一个办公室工作环境,并使用语义差异研究了人们对四种不同照明条件的主观反应,其中不同的照度水平与光源的不同色温相结合。色温是人工照明研究中很少考虑的一个方面。研究结果表明:(1)被试对四种照明情境的主观判断差异显著;(2)被试相对长时间的重复照明情境会导致态度的改变;(3)被试的主观判断和偏好存在较大的个体间差异。这些结果表明,仅仅以平均为导向的办公室照明设计是不充分的,并且支持允许单独可调光源的照明概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信