Evidence for silica's neoplastic risk among workers and derivation of cancer risk assessment.

D F Goldsmith
{"title":"Evidence for silica's neoplastic risk among workers and derivation of cancer risk assessment.","authors":"D F Goldsmith","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although there has been debate in the medical community about silica's carcinogenicity since the 1930s, only in the past decade have there emerged scientific data supporting a causal association between industrial silica exposure and lung cancer. This paper examines the evidence for the association, with a particular focus on those studies appropriate for cancer risk assessment. The cancer risk extrapolations from epidemiology studies suggest that the levels of risks are approximately two factors less than that derived from animal studies. Additional research is needed to provide a stronger basis for the extrapolations so that policy makers can have more confidence in their estimates.</p>","PeriodicalId":15789,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology","volume":"7 3","pages":"291-301"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although there has been debate in the medical community about silica's carcinogenicity since the 1930s, only in the past decade have there emerged scientific data supporting a causal association between industrial silica exposure and lung cancer. This paper examines the evidence for the association, with a particular focus on those studies appropriate for cancer risk assessment. The cancer risk extrapolations from epidemiology studies suggest that the levels of risks are approximately two factors less than that derived from animal studies. Additional research is needed to provide a stronger basis for the extrapolations so that policy makers can have more confidence in their estimates.

工人中二氧化硅肿瘤风险的证据和癌症风险评估的推导。
尽管自20世纪30年代以来医学界就一直在争论二氧化硅的致癌性,但直到过去十年才出现科学数据支持工业二氧化硅暴露与肺癌之间的因果关系。本文考察了这种关联的证据,特别关注那些适合癌症风险评估的研究。从流行病学研究中推断出的癌症风险表明,风险水平大约比从动物研究中得出的风险水平低两个因素。需要进行更多的研究,为推断提供更有力的基础,以便决策者对他们的估计更有信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信