[Peroperative manometric evaluation of posterior fundoplication by celioscopy].

K Slim, J Chipponi, M Chanudet, G Lescure, J Boulant, D Pezet
{"title":"[Peroperative manometric evaluation of posterior fundoplication by celioscopy].","authors":"K Slim,&nbsp;J Chipponi,&nbsp;M Chanudet,&nbsp;G Lescure,&nbsp;J Boulant,&nbsp;D Pezet","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate objectively the effects of a laparoscopic posterior fundoplication on the pressure and length of the lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) and to compare these results to those of a group of patient who underwent the same technique through a laparotomy. Fourty six patients were included in the laparoscopic group and 48 in the open group. Intraoperative manometry was performed using the same material before and after the posterior fundoplication (after evacuating the pneumoperitoneum). Criteria of assessment were the increases in pressure and length of the LOS. The two groups were comparable regarding age, rate of hiatal hernia, and stage of the oesophagitis. In the laparoscopic group, the mean pressure of LOS (mmHg) increased from 10.1 +/- 3.8 to 35.2 +/- 12 after the fundoplication (that is 3.5 times) and the length of LOS (cm) increased from 3.4 +/- 0.8 to 4.8 +/- 0.8 (that is 1.4 times). In the open group the increase was for the pressure and length respectively 3.3 times and 1.5 times the initial values. Thus by performing the same procedure we obtained the same effects on the pressure and length of the LOS. The effectiveness of laparoscopic posterior fundoplication should be similar to that of the open procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":10182,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgie; memoires de l'Academie de chirurgie","volume":"122 2","pages":"144-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgie; memoires de l'Academie de chirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate objectively the effects of a laparoscopic posterior fundoplication on the pressure and length of the lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) and to compare these results to those of a group of patient who underwent the same technique through a laparotomy. Fourty six patients were included in the laparoscopic group and 48 in the open group. Intraoperative manometry was performed using the same material before and after the posterior fundoplication (after evacuating the pneumoperitoneum). Criteria of assessment were the increases in pressure and length of the LOS. The two groups were comparable regarding age, rate of hiatal hernia, and stage of the oesophagitis. In the laparoscopic group, the mean pressure of LOS (mmHg) increased from 10.1 +/- 3.8 to 35.2 +/- 12 after the fundoplication (that is 3.5 times) and the length of LOS (cm) increased from 3.4 +/- 0.8 to 4.8 +/- 0.8 (that is 1.4 times). In the open group the increase was for the pressure and length respectively 3.3 times and 1.5 times the initial values. Thus by performing the same procedure we obtained the same effects on the pressure and length of the LOS. The effectiveness of laparoscopic posterior fundoplication should be similar to that of the open procedure.

[术中应用腹腔镜测压评价后眼底塌陷]。
本前瞻性研究的目的是客观评价腹腔镜后底叠术对食管下括约肌(LOS)压力和长度的影响,并将这些结果与一组通过剖腹手术接受相同技术的患者的结果进行比较。腹腔镜组46例,开放组48例。术中测压采用相同的材料前后(气腹排出后)。评估标准是LOS的压力和长度的增加。两组在年龄、裂孔疝发生率和食管炎分期方面具有可比性。腹腔镜组眼底叠底后LOS平均压(mmHg)由10.1 +/- 3.8增加到35.2 +/- 12(即3.5倍),LOS长度(cm)由3.4 +/- 0.8增加到4.8 +/- 0.8(即1.4倍)。开放组压力和长度分别增加3.3倍和1.5倍。因此,通过执行相同的程序,我们对LOS的压力和长度获得了相同的影响。腹腔镜后路扩底术的效果应与开放式手术相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信