N.P.V. Nair, D. Bakish, B. Saxena, M. Amin, G. Schwartz, T.E.G. West
{"title":"Comparison of fluvoxamine, imipramine, and placebo in the treatment of outpatients with panic disorder","authors":"N.P.V. Nair, D. Bakish, B. Saxena, M. Amin, G. Schwartz, T.E.G. West","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1522-7154(1996)2:4<192::AID-ANXI6>3.0.CO;2-Q","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Fluvoxamine and imipramine were compared to placebo in an 8-week double-blind randomized multicentre trial comprising of 148 outpatients between 19 and 57 years of age (mean: 35) with a DSM-III-R diagnosis of Panic Disorder. Mean daily dose at endpoint was: fluvoxamine, 171.4 mg; imipramine 164.7 mg. The mean number of panic attacks per week at baseline were 10.9, 14.4 and 6.5 for fluvoxamine, imipramine and placebo, respectively. The intent-to-treat analysis of the change from baseline (difference score) of the number of panic attacks at endpoint revealed: a difference of 3.3 attacks (95% CI: -0.3, 6.8) between fluvoxamine and placebo and a difference of 6.0 attacks (95% CI: 1.5, 10.5) between imipramine and placebo. Treatment was stopped prematurely in 31 (62%) on fluvoxamine, 16 (33%) on imipramine and 29 (58%) on placebo. The number of patients withdrawing due to intolerance was 13 (26%) for fluvoxamine, 10 (21%) for imipramine and 4 (8%) for placebo. The number of patients withdrawing due to lack of efficacy was 10 (20%) for fluvoxamine, 4 (8%) for imipramine and 12 (24%) for placebo. Overall, this study demonstrated that fluvoxamine was not effective in the treatment of panic disorder but did show a strong effect for imipramine. A chance occurrence of significantly fewer number of panic attacks in the placebo group at baseline may limit the conclusions of this study. Anxiety 2:192–198 (1996). © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</p>","PeriodicalId":79474,"journal":{"name":"Anxiety","volume":"2 4","pages":"192-198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1522-7154(1996)2:4<192::AID-ANXI6>3.0.CO;2-Q","citationCount":"36","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291522-7154%281996%292%3A4%3C192%3A%3AAID-ANXI6%3E3.0.CO%3B2-Q","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36
Abstract
Fluvoxamine and imipramine were compared to placebo in an 8-week double-blind randomized multicentre trial comprising of 148 outpatients between 19 and 57 years of age (mean: 35) with a DSM-III-R diagnosis of Panic Disorder. Mean daily dose at endpoint was: fluvoxamine, 171.4 mg; imipramine 164.7 mg. The mean number of panic attacks per week at baseline were 10.9, 14.4 and 6.5 for fluvoxamine, imipramine and placebo, respectively. The intent-to-treat analysis of the change from baseline (difference score) of the number of panic attacks at endpoint revealed: a difference of 3.3 attacks (95% CI: -0.3, 6.8) between fluvoxamine and placebo and a difference of 6.0 attacks (95% CI: 1.5, 10.5) between imipramine and placebo. Treatment was stopped prematurely in 31 (62%) on fluvoxamine, 16 (33%) on imipramine and 29 (58%) on placebo. The number of patients withdrawing due to intolerance was 13 (26%) for fluvoxamine, 10 (21%) for imipramine and 4 (8%) for placebo. The number of patients withdrawing due to lack of efficacy was 10 (20%) for fluvoxamine, 4 (8%) for imipramine and 12 (24%) for placebo. Overall, this study demonstrated that fluvoxamine was not effective in the treatment of panic disorder but did show a strong effect for imipramine. A chance occurrence of significantly fewer number of panic attacks in the placebo group at baseline may limit the conclusions of this study. Anxiety 2:192–198 (1996). © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
氟伏沙明、丙咪嗪和安慰剂治疗门诊惊恐障碍的比较
在一项为期8周的双盲随机多中心试验中,将氟伏沙明和丙咪嗪与安慰剂进行比较,该试验包括148名年龄在19至57岁之间(平均:35岁)的门诊患者,这些患者被诊断为DSM-III-R诊断为惊恐障碍。终点平均日剂量为:氟伏沙明,171.4 mg;丙咪嗪164.7毫克。氟伏沙明组、丙咪嗪组和安慰剂组每周平均惊恐发作次数分别为10.9次、14.4次和6.5次。对终点惊恐发作次数从基线变化的意向治疗分析(差异评分)显示:氟伏沙明和安慰剂之间的差异为3.3次(95% CI: -0.3, 6.8),丙咪嗪和安慰剂之间的差异为6.0次(95% CI: 1.5, 10.5)。氟伏沙明组31例(62%),丙咪嗪组16例(33%),安慰剂组29例(58%)过早停止治疗。氟伏沙明组13例(26%),丙咪嗪组10例(21%),安慰剂组4例(8%)。因缺乏疗效而退出治疗的患者人数为氟伏沙明组10人(20%),丙咪嗪组4人(8%),安慰剂组12人(24%)。总的来说,这项研究表明氟伏沙明对治疗惊恐障碍无效,但对丙咪嗪有很强的效果。安慰剂组在基线时惊恐发作次数明显减少的偶然性可能限制了本研究的结论。焦虑:192 - 198(1996)。©1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。